WP/26904/2025 of MUNUKURU MURALIDHAR REDDY Vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH on 11 November 2025

1. MUNUKURU MURALIDHAR REDDY, S/O. BALAKRISHNA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, OCCAGRICULTURE, R/O H. NO. 16-4- 966-C, PINAKINI AVENUE,

APPOLLO HOSPITAL, HARINATHAPURAM EXTENSION, NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT

2. GANDAVARAPU SAROJA, W/O. DAYAKAR REDDY, AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, OCCHOME MAKER, R/O H.NO. 26-6-328/8, TEMPLE TREE RESIDENCES, PAVANI GARDEN KALYANI MANDAPARN, GOMATHI NAGAR, NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT

3. P.RAMMOHAN REDDY, S/O. VENU GOPAL REDDY, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, OCCAGRICULTURE, R/O. 3-21, NIDIGUNTA PALEM, NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT

...PETITIONER(S) AND

1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,

REVENUE (ENDOWMENTS) DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P. 2.

2. THE COMMISSIONER, ENDOWMENTS DEPARTMENT, GOLLAPUDI, VIJAYAWADA

3. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, ENDOWMENTS DEPARTMENT, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

4. THE DISTRICT ENDOWMENTS OFFICER/ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, ENDOWMENTS DEPARTMENT, NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT

5. SRI VIRUPAKHSEWARA SWAMY VARLA DEVASTHANAM, EPURU VILLAGE, MUTUKURU MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT REPRESENTED BY ITS EXECUTIVE OFFICER 6.

6. DUVVURI VISWA MOHAN REDDY, S/O LATE RANGA REDDY, AGED ABOUT

YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURIST,

R/O METTAPALEM VILLAGE, DORUVULAPALEM POST,

VIA NIDUGUNTAPALEM , MUTUKURU MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT - 524323

...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents 2 to 4 to take action as per the report of the 5TH respondent dated 29.08.2025 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):

1. D V SASIDHAR Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR ENDOWMENTS

2. DEVI SUBHASHINI ANNE SC For Endowments

3. M VIDYASAGAR

The Court made the following Order:

Heard Sri D.V. Sasidhar, learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Endowments, Smt. Anne Devi Subhashini, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent No.5 – Temple.

2. The present writ petition has been filed challenging the inaction of the respondents in taking action on the irregularities committed by the respondent No.6.

3. When the matter was taken up for consideration today, Sri D.V. Sasidhar, learned counsel for the petitioners has placed before the Court a copy of proceedings of the respondent No.2, dated 05.11.2025 received by him in the case. A perusal of the same reflects that, pursuant to the representation made by the petitioners, the department has proposed action against respondent No. 6 and, in that connection, a show cause notice has also been issued. Learned counsel for the petitioners further submits that since the grievance of the petitioners has been resolved, no further orders are required to be passed in the writ petition.

4. In view of the foregoing, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, all pending miscellaneous applications shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA

Date: 12.11.2025 MSI

Date: 12.11.2025 MSI