Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/30271/2024 of KAVATI MANGAMMA Vs THE NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA on 9 November 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] MONDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 30271/2024 Between: 1. KAVATI MANGAMMA, W/O.LATE KAVATI SAMBA SIVA RAO AGED ABOUT 66

APHC010580362024

IN THE HIGH COURT OF

ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

MONDAY,THE TENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM

WRIT PETITION NO: 30271/2024

Between:

1. KAVATI MANGAMMA, W/O.LATE KAVATI SAMBA SIVA RAO

AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, R/O.D.NO.3-141 RAJAKA STREET, PORANKI, VIJAYAWADA - 621 137 NTR DISTRICT, ANDHRA

PRADESH

...PETITIONER

AND

1. THE NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA, ANDHRA

PRADESH REGION, PLOT NO.21, TEACHERS COLONY, GURUNANAK NAGAR ROAD, VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT, AP

REP. BY ITS REGIONAL OFFICER.

2. THE NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA, PROJECT

IMPLEMENTATION UNIT, PLOT NO.21, TEACHERS COLONY, GURUNANAK NAGAR ROAD VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT, AP

REP. BY ITS PROJECT DIRECTOR.

3. LANCO KONDAPALLI POWER LIMITED, IDA KONDAPALLI, IBRAHMPATNAM

MANDAL

NTR

DISTRICT,

ANDHRA

JS,J

W.P.No.30271 of 2024

PRADESH- 521228 REP. BY ITS LIQUIDATOR

...RESPONDENT(S):

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in interfering with petitioner land without any notice to change the alignment of existing 400 kilovolts/high voltage transmission line of the 3rd respondent in such a manner that transmission towers/lines of the 3rd respondent will be installed in the lands of the petitioner admeasuring Ac.0.47 Sq.Yards in R.S.No. 240/1

situated at Jakkampudi village, Vijayawada Rural Mandal, N.T.R District with paying any compensation as arbitrary, illegal, without any authority and in violation of Article 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to pay compensation for the damage occurred in the land of the petitioner and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2024

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents and their agents or contractors not to install any transmission tower or transmission line of the 3rd respondent in the land of the petitioner admeasuring an extent of Ac.0.47 14 Sq.Yards in R.S.No. 240/1 situated at Jakkampudi Village, Vijayawada Rural Mandal, N.T.R District, Andhra Pradesh, pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. PASUPULATI ANITHA

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. P SOMA SEKHARA NAIDU

JS,J

W.P.No.30271 of 2024

2. PADMA RAO G S LAKKARAJU

3.

The Court made the following:

JS,J

W.P.No.30271 of 2024

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief: “to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in interfering with petitioner land without any notice to change the alignment of existing 400 kilovolts/high voltage transmission line of the 3rd respondent in such a manner that transmission towers/lines of the 3rd respondent will be installed in the lands of the petitioner admeasuring Ac.0.47½ cents in R.S.No.240/1 situated at Jakkampudi village, Vijayawada Rural Mandal, N.T.R. District without paying any compensation, as arbitrary, illegal, without any authority and in violation of Article 14,21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to pay compensation for the damage occurred in the land of the petitioner and to pass such other order or orders as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit just and proper in the circumstances of the case.”

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents and perused the record.

JS,J W.P.No.30271 of 2024

3. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned Standing Counsel for respondent Nos. 1 and 2, submits that during the pendency of the writ petition, the respondents have decided not to install any transmission towers in the petitioner’s land and have adopted an alternate alignment for laying the transmission line.

4. Recording the submission made by learned Standing Counsel for respondent Nos.1 and 2, the Writ Petition is closed. However, it is open to the petitioner to approach this Court, in case any fresh cause arises. No order as to costs.

Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the writ petition shall stand closed. ____________________ SUMATHI JAGADAM, J 10th November, 2025 cbs

JS,J W.P.No.30271 of 2024

HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM

W.P.No.30271 of 2024

10th November, 2025 cbs

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead