Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRP/809/2020 of LALAM SREERAMA MURTHY @ SRIRAM Vs RUTHALA BHASKARA RAO on 6 November 2025
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3560] FRIDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 809, 814 & 815/2020 Between: 1. LALAM SREERAMA MURTHY, S/O. BAPU
APHC010116622020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA
PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 809, 814 & 815/2020
Between:
1. LALAM SREERAMA MURTHY, S/O. BAPU NAIDU, AGED
46 YEARS, HINDU, CULTIVATION, RIO. D.NO.2/35, THOTAKURAPALEM VILLAGE IN RAVIKAMATHAM
MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT.
2. LALAM PYDI NAIDU, S/O. BAPU NAIDU, AGED 50
YEARS,
HINDU,
CULTIVATION
R/O.
D.NO.2/35,
VILLAGE
IN
RAVIKAMATHAM
MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT.
3. PALLI SATYAVATHI, W/O.APPALANAIDU, AGED 55
YEARS, HINDU, RESIDING AT PEDABURUGUPALEM
VILLAGE
IN
MAKAVARAPALEM
MANDAL,
VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT.
4. KADIMPUDI
LAKSHMI
@
CHINATHALLI,
W/O.
CHINNARAO, AGED 42 YEARS, HINDU, RESIDING AT
METTAPALEM VILLAGE IN NARSIPATNAM MANDAL,
VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER(S)
AND
1. RUTHULA BHASKARA RAO, S/O. KANNA BABU, AGED
42 YEARS, HINDU, CULTIVATION, R/O. D.NO. 2/23,
VILLAGE
IN
RAVIKAMATHAM
MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT.
2. RUTTALA SOMUNAIDU, S/O. KANNABABU AGED 38
YEARS, HINDU, CULTIVATION, R/O. D.NO. 2/23, THOTAKURAPALEM VILLAGE IN RAVIKAMATHAM
MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT.
3. LALAM LAKSHMI, W/O. SATYANARAYANA, AGED 35
YEARS, R/O. DOOR NO. 2/24, THOTAKURAPALEM
VILLAGE
IN
RAVIKAMATHAM
MANDAL,
VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT.
4. RUTHALA SATYAVATHI, W/O LATE KANNABABU, AGED
YEARS,
HINDU,
HOUSEHOLD
DUTIES,
R/O.
THOTAKURAPALEM
VILLAGE,
VISAKHAPATNAM
DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. NIVARTHI MRUTHYANJAYA SASTRY
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Common Order:
This Civil Revision Petitions have been preferred by the petitioners aggrieved by the decree and common order, dated 17.02.2020 passed in I.A.Nos.58, 59 and 60 of 2020 in O.S.No.134 of 2012 on the file of the learned Senior Civil Judge, Chodavaram.
2. Sri A. S. Virat, learned counsel representing Sri V. M. Sastry, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners, submits that the main suit pending before the learned Court below has already been disposed of, and therefore, the cause in the present revisions no longer survives and the matters have become infructuous.
3. Recording the said submission, the Civil Revision Petitions are dismissed as infructuous.
4. As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Civil Revision Petitions shall stand closed.
_______________________ SUBHENDU SAMANTA, J. Date:07.11.2025 ARB
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA
Civil Revision Petition No.809, 814 and 815 of 2020
Date: 07.11.2025
ARB