CRLRC/552/2009 of L.MUKTHAR AHMED & ANOTHER Vs THE STATE OF A.P. & ANOTHER on 5 November 2025

1. L.MUKTHAR AHMED & ANOTHER, S/O MASTAN SAB, MANAGER V.B.S.EXTRACTION & REGINERIES PVT. LTD., 17/702, ALUR ROAD, ADONI,

2. V.B.S.EXTRACTION & REGINERIES PVT. LTD.,, REP. BY ITS MANAGER L.MUKTHAR AHMED, 17/702, ALUR ROAD, ADONI, KURNOOL DIST.

...PETITIONER(S) AND

1. THE STATE OF A P ANOTHER, REP. BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF A.P., HYDERABAD.

2. THE FOOD INSPECTOR, DIVISION - II, GUNTUR DIST.

...RESPONDENT(S): Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the CriminalRevisionCase, the High Court may be pleased toto allow the Crl.R.C., by setting-aside the Judgment passed in Crl.A.No.120 of 2008, dated 31.03.09 on the file of the IV Addl. Dist. & Sessions Judge, Guntur, confirming the conviction and sentence imposed in C.C.No.478 of 2002, dated 31.03.08 on the file of the IV Addl. Junior Civil Judge, Guntur and consequently acquit the petitioners.

SS,J Crl.R.C.No.552 of 2009

IA NO: 1 OF 2009(CRLRCMP 734 OF 2009 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to enlarge the petitioners herein on bail by suspending the sentence of imprisonment imposed in in C.C.No.478 of 2002, dated 31.03.08 on the file of the IV Addl. Junior Civil Judge, Guntur as confirmed in Crl.A.No.120 of 2008, dated 31.03.09 on the file of the IV Addl. Dist. & Sessions Judge, Guntur, pending disposal of the Crl.R.C. Counsel for the Petitioner(S):

1. J JANAKIRAMI REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP)

SS,J Crl.R.C.No.552 of 2009

The Court made the following Order:

Both the petitioners are sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of six (06) months and also sentenced to pay a fine of Rs.1,000/- (Rupees One Thousand Only) each in default of payment of fine. They shall also ordered to undergo simple imprisonment for further period of one (01) month for the offence punishable under Section 16(1)(a) of Prevention of Food Adulteration Act by the learned IV Additional Junior Civil Judge, Guntur.

2. The said order of conviction was confirmed by the learned Special Sessions Judge-Cum-IV Additional District & Sessions Judge, Guntur vide its Order, dated 31.03.2009, in Criminal Appeal No.120 of 2008. Assailing both the Orders, the instant Criminal Revision has been preferred.

3. This Criminal Revision has been preferred by A3 & A4. A3 is the Manager-Cum-Director of A4.

4. During the pendency of the instant Criminal Revision, a Report was called for regarding the status of the petitioners. The Inspector of Police, Adoni II Town Police Station, has placed a Report. In the Report, it appears that the petitioner No.1 (A3) namely Sri Lohar Mukthair Ahmmed was expired on 20.05.2021.

5. The petitioner No.1/A3 being the Director of the private limited company and petitioner No.2/A4 being the juristic person i.e., a company, is not required to proceed further with this matter.

SS,J Crl.R.C.No.552 of 2009

6. Accordingly, nothing left for this Court to decide the instant Criminal Revision and thus, the instant Criminal Revision became infructuous and the same is hereby disposed of.

As a sequel, interlocutory applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. _______________________ SUBHENDU SAMANTA, J

KPV

SS,J

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA

CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No:552 of 2009

06.11.2025

KPV