Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/16768/2025 of C A RAMESH REDDY Vs THE HIGH COURT OF AP on 3 November 2025
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3559] TUESDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA WRIT PETITION NO: 16768/2025 Between: 1. C A RAMESH
APHC010329912025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF NOVEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA
WRIT PETITION NO: 16768/2025
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. C A RAMESH REDDY, (UNDER SUSPENSION) JUNIOR ASSISTANT S/O C.A NAGI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE COURT, ALLAGDDA, R/O 1-122, KRISTIPADU MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE HIGH COURT OF AP, REP BY ITS REGISTRAR,(VIGILANCE) AT AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE, KURNOOL CUM DISCIPLINARY AUTHORITY, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ Order or Direction particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not reinstating the petitioner into service even after concluding the departmental enquiry on 17.05.2023 continuing the petitioner under suspension from 23.07.2016 as illegal, arbitrary, and violative of several precedents of this Hon’ble Court and also contrary to the principles of natural justice and also violative of Article 14 and 16 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to reinstate the petitioner into service and pass
IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents to reinstate the petitioner into service considering the order passed by in departmental enquiry No 2/2022 dated 17.05.2023 vide Dis. No 3287/Estt/2023 pending disposal of the above Writ Petition and also pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. Pilla N.V.L.Narayana Aditya Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. VIVEK CHANDRA SEKHAR S
The Court made the following Order: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice R. Raghunandan Rao)
Sri Vivek Chandra Sekhar, learned Standing Counsel has placed the proceedings dated 03.11.2025 issued by the Principal District Judge, Kurnool, reinstating the petitioner into service.
Learned Standing Counsel would also state that the petitioner is rejoined services.
In the circumstances, nothing would further survive in the present writ petition. It is, accordingly, closed, leaving it open to the petitioner to agitate any further issues, in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. _______________________ R RAGHUNANDAN RAO, J
_______________________ SUBHENDU SAMANTHA, J Date: 04.11.2025 SPP
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO
AND
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA
WRIT PETITION No.16768 of 2025 (per Hon’ble Sri Justice R Raghunandan Rao)
04.11.2025
SPP