Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/2754/2025 of Ganaji Venkateswarlu, Vs Palathoti gloria, on 2 November 2025
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3458] MONDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2754/2025 Between: 1. GANAJI VENKATESWARLU,, S/O. (LATE) VENKATA SUBBAIAH, AGED
APHC010501522025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF NOVEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. GANAJI VENKATESWARLU,, S/O. (LATE) VENKATA SUBBAIAH, AGED ABOUT 90 YEARS R/O. D.NO.1-81, KOLALAPUDI, MARTUR MANDAL, BAPATLADISTRICT.
...PETITIONER AND
1. PALATHOTI GLORIA, Bapatla Revenue Divisional Officer Bapatla District.
...CONTEMNOR Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the Respondent herein for wilful violation and deliberate disobedience to the orders dated 12.08.2025 passed in W.P. No. 20684 of 2025, under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. PILLIX LAW FIRM Counsel for the Contemnor:
1. J DILEEP KUMAR
The Court made the following Order:
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri J. Dileep Kumar, learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondent/Contemnor.
2. When the matter has been taken up for consideration today, learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for the respondent has placed before the Court a copy of order passed by the Contemnor, Revenue Divisional Officer, Bapatla District. A perusal of the same would reflect that the directions of this Court passed in W.P.No.20684 of 2025, dated 12.08.2025 has been complied with and no further orders are required to be passed in the present Contempt Case.
3. Having regard to the same, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall also stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA Dated: 03-11-2025 MSI
Dated: 03-11-2025 MSI