Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/23784/2024 of K KENCHAJJA Vs REGISTRAR(ADMINISTRATION) on 2 November 2025
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3559] MONDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA WRIT PETITION NO: 23784/2024 Between: 1. K KENCHAJJA,
APHC010461802024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY,THE THIRD DAY OF NOVEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA
WRIT PETITION NO: 23784/2024
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. K KENCHAJJA, S/O. S. RANGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, PRESENTLY WORKING AS JUNIOR ASSISTANT CIVIL JUDGE (JUNIOR DIVISION) COURT, RAYADURGAM.
...PETITIONER AND
1. REGISTRARADMINISTRATION, HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE A.P, AMARAVATI.
2. PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE, ANANTHAPURAMU.
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order, or direction particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders as per rule 21(3) of Special Rules on appeal dated 01.07.2021, by declaring the action of the respondents in not considering appeal as illegal, arbitrary, and violation of articles 14, 16, 21 of the Constitution of India and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 1st respondent to pass appropriate orders as per rule 21(3) of A.P.
Judicial Subordinate Service rules immediately on appeal filed by the petitioner dated 01.07.2021 pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. C SRINIVASA BABA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. S PRANATHI
The Court made the following order: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice R.Raghunandan Rao)
The petitioner, who was earlier working as a Junior Assistant in the Court of the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Rayadurgam, Ananthapuramu District had approached the Principal District Judge, Ananthapuramu for re- fixation of his salary. The application of the petitioner came to be dismissed by the Principal District Judge, Ananthapuramu by way of proceedings dated 03.06.2021. Aggrieved by the said order of rejection, the petitioner approached the 1st respondent herein on 01.07.2021, by way of an appeal, under Rule 26(a) of the A.P.State and Subordinate Service Rules, 1996.
2. The petitioner has now approached this Court seeking disposal of the said appeal, as the same has been pending for the last four (4) years.
3. Smt.S.Pranathi, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents, on instructions, submits that the appeal filed by the petitioner has been disposed of on 18.09.2025.
4. In those circumstances, nothing further survives for adjudication in this writ petition.
5. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed, leaving it open to the petitioner to avail of his remedies under law. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO, J
______________________ SUBHENDU SAMANTA, J
Date: 03.11.2025 KA/KSS
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA
WRIT PETITION NO: 23784/2024
Date: 03.11.2025 KA/KSS