Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/13491/2015 of Siddammagari Hanumantha Reddy, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal on 30 October 2025
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH FRIDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY WRIT PETITION Between: 1. SIDDAMMAGARI HANUMANTHA REDDY,, S/O. SANJEEVA REDDY, AGED 44 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O. GAJARAMPALLI VILLAGE &
APHC010687912015
IN TH
FRIDAY, TH
TWO
THE HONOURABLE SR
WR
Between:
1. SIDDAMMAGARI H
AGED 44 YEARS,
& POST, PAMIDI M
1. THE STATE OF
SECRETARY,
R
BUILDINGS, HYDE
2. THE
DISTRICT
ANANTAPURAM.
3. THE REVENUE D
ANANTAPURAM, A
4. THE TAHSILDAR,
DISTRICT.
5. YEDDULA TULASA
YEARS,
GA
ANANTAPURAM D
6. YEDDULA TIRUPA
YEARS,
GA
ANANTAPURAM D
7. YEDDULA SAMBA
E HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRAD
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
HE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF OCTOBE
THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
RI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVEND
RIT PETITION NO: 13491/2015
HANUMANTHA REDDY,, S/O. SANJE
OCC: BUSINESS, R/O. GAJARAMP
ANDAL, ANANTAPURAM DISTRICT
AND
ANDHRA PRADESH REP BY ITS
REVENUE
DEPARTMENT,
S
RABAD.
COLLECTOR
ANANTAPURAM
IVISIONAL OFFICER ANANTAPUR
, PAMIDI MANDAL, PAMIDI, AN
AMMA, W/O. SAMBASIVA REDDY,
AJARAMPALLI
VILLAGE,
PAMID
ISTRICT.
AL REDDY, S/O. SARABHA REDDY,
AJARAMPALLI
VILLAGE,
PAMID
ISTRICT.
ASIVA REDDY, S/O. SARABHA R
DESH
ER
DRANATH ROY
EEVA REDDY,
PALLI VILLAGE
.
...PETITIONER
S PRINCIPAL,
SECRETARIAT
M
DISTRICT,
RAM DIVISION,
NANTAPURAM
AGED ABOUT
DI
MANDAL,
AGED ABOUT
DI
MANDAL,
REDDY, AGED
CMR,J
W.P.No.13491 of 2015
ABOUT 43 YEARS, GAJARAMPALLI VILLAGE, PAMIDI MANDAL,
ANANTAPURAM DISTRICT.
8. YEDDULA PRATAP REDDY, S/O. SARABHA REDDY, AGED ABOUT
YEARS,
GAJARAMPALLI
VILLAGE,
PAMIDI
MANDAL,
ANANTAPURAM DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toIssue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in trying to disposes the petitioner from his land in Sy.No. Sy.No.266/A2B an extent of Ac.0.17 cents situated at Gajarampalli Village, Pamidi Mandal, Anantapuram District, even though there is lease in favour of the petitioner vide D.Dis.No.430/908, dated 03-01-2015 is illegal, arbitrary and violation of Principles of Natural Justice, consequently direct the respondents not to interfere with peaceful possession and enjoyment of petitioners land in Sy.No.
SyNo.266/A2B an extent of Ac.0.17, forthwith, and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2015(WPMP 17715 OF 2015
direct the respondents not to interfere with peaceful possession and enjoyment of petitioners land in Sy.No. Sy.No.266/A2B an extent of Ac.0.17
cents situated at Gajarampalli Village, Pamidi Mandal, Anantapuram District, pending disposal of the main writ petition, and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2024
pleased to vacate the interim dated 20-12-2022 in WP.No 13491 of 2015 and to dismiss the writ petition and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2024
pleased to Permit the petitioners to implead as a party respondent no. 5 to 8
CMR,J
W.P.No.13491 of 2015
in the present writ petition i.e., W.P.No. 13491 of 2015 as well as LA, pending before this Horible Court and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.K SRINIVAS
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.GP FOR REVENUE (AP)
CMR,J
W.P.No.13491 of 2015
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Mr. M.Ram Prasad, learned counsel representing Mr. K.Srinivas, learned counsel for the writ petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition on the ground that the grievance of the writ petitioner has been redressed.
2. Permission is accorded.
3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
________________________________________ JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY
Date: 31.10.2025 MDP