WP/3046/2016 of KANCHARANA SAROJINI, VISAKHAPATNAM Vs PRL SECY, REVENUE DEPT,. HYD & 4 OT on 30 October 2025

APHC010427282016

IN TH

FRIDAY, TH

TWO

THE HONOURABLE SR

W

Between:

1. KANCHARANA

SURYANARAYANA

MADHAVADHARA

1. PRL SECY REVEN

DEPARTMENT, SE

2. THE DISTRICT CO

3. THE REVENUE DIV

4. THE TAHSILDAR U

5. VISAKHAPATNAM

ITS VICE CHAIRMA

Petition under Articl

circumstances stated in

pleased toIssue an appro

in the nature of Writ of M

not regularizing the petitio

39-17-1/3, Plot No. 46 ad

Ward No. 41A (New War

Madhavadhara Village, V

E HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRAD

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

HE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF OCTOBE

THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

PRESENT

RI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVEND

RIT PETITION NO: 3046/2016

SAROJINI,

VISAKHAPATNA

A

AGED

YEARS

R/O

D.N

VISAKHAPATNAM

AND

NUE DEPT HYD 4 OT, GOVERNME

ECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD

LLECTOR VISAKHAPATNAM,

VISIONAL OFFICER VISAKHAPATNA

URBAN VISAKHAPATNAM, -

URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHOR

AN SIRIPURAM, VISAKHAPATNAM

...RES

le 226 of the Constitution of India pra

the affidavit filed therewith, the High

opriate writ or order or direction more

Mandamus declare the action of the

oner's land of an extent of 200 Sq.Yds

dmeasuring 200 Sq.Yds. in Sy.No. 39

rd No. 39), Assessment No. 100004/9

Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam Distr

DESH

ER

DRANATH ROY

AM,

W/O

NO.

39-19-23,

...PETITIONER

ENT REVENUE

AM, -

RITY, REP. BY

SPONDENT(S):

aying that in the

h Court may be

particularly one

Respondents in

s. bearing D.No.

9/1A1/1A3 Rart,

90240 situate at

ict in pursuance

CMR,J

W.P.No.3046 of 2016

of G.O.Ms.No. 747 Revenue (UC.I) Department dated 18.06.2008 as illegal, arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice and consequentially direct the Respondents to regularize the petitioner's land as per G.O.Ms.No. 747

Revenue (UC.I) Department dated 18.06.2008 in the interests of justice and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP 3859 OF 2016

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the respondents not to create any third party interest more particularly in favour of 5th respondent in respect of petitioner's land of an extent of 200 Sq.

Yards bearing D.No.39-17-1/3, Plot No. 46, admeasuring 200 Sq. Yard sin Sy.No.39/1A1/1A3 Part, Ward No. 41A (New Ward No. 3o9) Assessment No.

100004/90240

situated

at

Madhavadhara

Village,

Visakhapatnam,

Visakhapatnam District pending disposal fo the above Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:

1.K SRINIVASA RAO

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1.GP FOR REVENUE (AP)

2.SOMISETTY GANESH BABU SC For VUDA and MUDA

CMR,J

W.P.No.3046 of 2016

The Court made the following: