Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/29524/2025 of KODAVALI RAVI KUMAR Vs THE AUTHORIZED OFFICER on 29 October 2025
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH THURSDAY, TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY THE HONOURABLE WRIT PETITION NO: 29524/2025 Between: 1. KODAVALI RAVI KUMAR, S/O RAGENDRA PRASAD, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, OCC FP SHOP DEALER WATCHMAN, 2. KODAVALI VISRANTAMMA,
APHC010568782025
IN TH
THURSDAY
TWO
THE HONOURABLE SR
THE HONOURAB
WR
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. KODAVALI RAVI K 57 YEARS, OCC FP
2. KODAVALI VISRAN YEARS, OCC HOU 184, 5/1 LANE DISTRICT.
1. THE AUTHORIZED FLOOR, CENTRAL MARG, MUMBAI -
2. THE AUTHORISE (SPONCER CANAR FLOOR, KORITEP THEATRE, GUNTU Petition under Articl circumstances stated in pleased toPleased to iss the nature of Writ of Man not taking any action on t E HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRAD AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) Y, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF OCTOBE THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT RI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVEND BLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR G RIT PETITION NO: 29524/2025 UMAR, S/O RAGENDRA PRASAD, P SHOP DEALER WATCHMAN, NTAMMA, W/O RAVI KUMAR, AGE SE WIFE, NOTE BOTH ARE R/O H E, BONGARALABEEDU, GUNTUR ...P AND D OFFICER, RESERVE BANK OF L OFFICE BUILDING, SHAHID BH 400 001, INDIA. ED OFFICER, CAN FILL HOM RA BANK), DOOR NO 4-1-1, GAYA PADU MAIN ROAD. BESIDE HARI UR, GUNTUR DISTRICT ...RES le 226 of the Constitution of India pra the affidavit filed therewith, the High ue a Writ, order or direction more pa ndamus to declaring the action of the the Petitioners representation/compla DESH
ER DRANATH ROY GEDELA AGED ABOUT ED ABOUT 50 OUSE NO 7-6- R. GUNTUR PETITIONER(S) INDIA, 16TH HAGAT SINGH MES LIMITED, ATHRI BAZAR, HARA MAHAL SPONDENT(S): aying that in the h Court may be articularly one in Respondent for aint dated 24-09-
CMR,J& GTK,J W.P.No.29524 of 2025
2025 against the 2ND Respondent for issuance the notice under Section 13(13) of SARFAICE Act dated 03-04-2025 by treating the Petitioners account as NPA Non-performing Assets from 31-03- 2025 while receiving the instalment amounts is as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Principles of natural justice and the Constitution of India and also against the guidelines/rules of the Reserve Bank of India consequently direct the Respondent by conducting the inquiry on my representation/complaint dated 24- 09-2025 and take necessary action against the 2ND Respondent by set aside advocate Commissioner notice dated 18-10-2025 which is served on me 21-10- 2025 and pass such other order or orders as this Honble court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case in the interest of justice. IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. CH VIDYASAGAR Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. CMR,J& GTK,J W.P.No.29524 of 2025
The Court made the following: ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Cheekati Manavendranath Roy)
Mr. K.Tarun, learned counsel representing Mr. Ch. Vidyasagar, learned counsel for the writ petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition.
2. Permission is accorded.
3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
________________________________________ JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY
_____________________________ JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA
Date: 30.10.2025 MDP