CRLRC/1096/2008 of M/S. RENIASSANCE SECURITIES LIMITED, Vs K. SREENIVASULU REDDY AND ANOTHER, on 29 October 2025

APHC010407242008

IN THE H

(

THURSDAY, T

TWO TH

THE HONOURABL

CRIMINAL R

Between:

1. M/S. RENIASSAN

1. K SREENIVASUL

Revision filed unde

circumstances stated

CriminalRevisionCase,

the Orders as made in

Judicial 1 Class Magis

Proddatur the above

Memorandum of Crimin

IA NO: 1 OF 2008(CRL

Petition under S

circumstances stated in

High Court may be pl

Crl.RC

Counsel for the Petitio

1.V NITESH

Counsel for the Respo

1.PUBLIC PROSEC

2.S DUSHYANTH R

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

THE THIRTIETH DAY OF OCTOBER

HOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

PRESENT

LE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANT

REVISION CASE NO: 1096 OF 2008

NCE SECURITIES LIMITED,, -

...PETIT

AND

LU REDDY AND ANOTHER, -

...RESPON

er Section 397/401 of CrPC praying tha

in the affidavit filed in support

the High Court may be pleased toAggrie

C.F.R. No.484 of 2007 on the file of the strate, Proddatur, dated 1st day of Apr e named petitioner begs to prese al Revision LRCMP 1478 OF 2008

Section 151 CPC praying that

n the affidavit filed in support of the petit leased to expedite the hearing of the oner:

ondent:

UTOR

REDDY

TA

TIONER

NDENT

at in the

of the

eved by

e I Addl.

ril, 2007

ent this

in the

tion, the

e above

The Court made the following Order:

Instant Criminal Revision Case has been preferred against the Order of sentence, dated 01.04.2008, passed by the learned First Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate, Proddatur.

2.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner fairly submits that the observation of the learned First Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Proddatur, in paragraph No.5 of the impugned order appears to be justified. He further submits that the learned trial Court has acted according to the law.

3.

Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and considering the submissions of the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, there exists no merit in the instant Criminal Revision Case.

4.

Accordingly, the instant Criminal Revision Case is disposed of.

As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Criminal Revision Case, shall stand closed.

____________________________

JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA

Dated: 30.10.2025

TJN

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA

CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1096 OF 2008

Dated: 30.10.2025

TJN

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI

Criminal Revision Case No.1096 of 2008

PROCEEDING SHEET

Sl.

No.

Date