Andhra Pradesh High Court

CMA/857/2012 of PUTTURU RAVINDRA & 5 ORS Vs KURPATI VENAKTA SUBBAMMA @ SUBBAMMA & 6 ORS on 22 October 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] THURSDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 857/2012 Between: 1. PUTTURU RAVINDRA & 5 ORS, S/O.POTTURU

APHC010568682012

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

THURSDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF OCTOBER

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM

CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 857/2012

Between:

1. PUTTURU RAVINDRA & 5 ORS, S/O.POTTURU APPAIAH, HINDU, OCC:

CULTIVATION

R/O.TERENNAPALLI

VILLAGE,

H/O.NANDALAPADU, TADIPATRI RURAL MANDAL, ANANTAPUR

DISTRICT.

2. POTTURU RAMASEKHAR @ RAJASEKHAR, S/O.LATE POTTURU

TIRUPATHAIAH, HINDU, OCC: CULTIVATION R/O.TERENNAPALLI

VILLAGE,

H/O.NANDALAPADU,

TADIPATRI

RURAL

MANDAL,

ANANTAPUR DISTRICT.

3. KONA LAKSHMINARAYANA REDDY, S/O.KONA NAGI REDDY, HINDU, OCC: CULTIVATION R/O.NAGIREDDIPALLI [V], PUTLUR [M], ANANTAPUR DISTRICT.

4. SANGATI NARAYANAMMA, S/O.POTTURU APPAIAH, HINDU, OCC:

CULTIVATION R/O.DIGUVAPALLI [V], TADIPATRI RURAL MANDAL, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT.

5. CHAGAM NARAYANA REDDY, S/O.CHAGAM LAKSHMI REDDY, HINDU, OCC: CULTIVATION R/O.TIMMAPURAM [V], TADIPATRI

RURAL MANDAL, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT.

6. CHAGAM NAGI REDDY, S/O.CHAGAM CHENNA REDDY, HINDU, OCC: CULTIVATION R/O.TIMMAPURAM [V], TADIPATRI RURAL

MANDAL, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT.

...APPELLANT(S)

AND

JS,J

C.M.A.No.857/2012

1. KURPATI VENAKTA SUBBAMMA SUBBAMMA 6 ORS, W/O.LATE

KURUPATI RANGAPPA @ RANGAIAH, HINDU OCC: CULTIVATION, HOUSEWIFE R/O.RAMAPURAM VILLAGE, LADDAGIRI KOTTALA, KODUMURU MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT.

2. KURUPATI

PULLAIAH,

S/O.LATE

KURUPATI

RANGAPPA

@

RANGAIAH,

HINDU

OCC:

CULTIVATION,

HEAD

MASTER

R/O.PATHIKONDA VILLAGE & MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT.

3. KURUPATI CHINNA RAMAIAH RAMA NAIDU, W/O.LATE KURUPATI

RANGAPPA

@

RANGAIAH,

HINDU

OCC:

CULTIVATION

R/O.RAMAPURAM VILLAGE, LADDAGIRI KOTTALA, KODUMURU

MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT.

4. KURUPATI RANGASWAMY, W/O.LATE KURUPATI RANGAPPA @

RANGAIAH,

HINDU

OCC:

CULTIVATION

R/O.RAMAPURAM

VILLAGE, LADDAGIRI KOTTALA, KODUMURU MANDAL, KURNOOL

DISTRICT.

5. KURUPATI NAGAMMA, W/O.LATE KURUPATI PULLAIAH, HINDU, OCC:

HOUSEWIFE

VILLAGE,

H/O.NANDALAPADU, TADIPATRI RURAL MANDAL, ANANTAPUR

DISTRICT.

6. KURUPATI RAJENDRA PRASAD, S/O.LATE NAGA RANGAIAH, HINDU, OCC:

CULTIVATION

R/O.TERENNAPALLI

VILLAGE,

H/O.NANDALAPADU, TADIPATRI RURAL MANDAL, ANANTAPUR

DISTRICT.

7. IGUDURU RAMACHADNRA REDDY, S/O.LATE CHINNA NARAYANA

REDDY, HINDU, OCC: CULTIVATION R/O.TERENNAPALLI VILLAGE, H/O.NANDALAPADU, TADIPATRI RURAL MANDAL, ANANTAPUR

DISTRICT. [RESPONDENTS 1. 2 AND 9 IN IA NO.149/2011]

[RESPONDENTS 5 TO 7 ARE NOT NECESSARY IN THE PRESENT

APPEAL]

...RESPONDENT(S):

IA NO: 1 OF 2012(CMAMP 1587 OF 2012

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased suspend the order made in IA No.149/2011 in OS No.81/2011 dated 04.06.2011 on the file of the Spl.Sessions Judge for Trial of SCs and STs

JS,J

C.M.A.No.857/2012

Cases cum Addl. District Judge, Anantapur, in respect of Item No.7 and 8 of the schedule only, pending disposal of the main CMA

Counsel for the Appellant(S):

1. GANDURI NAGESWARA RAO

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM

2. ELEVATED AS JUDGE

The Court made the following:

JS,J

C.M.A.No.857/2012

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

JUDGMENT:

Sri Palanki Karteek, learned counsel, representing Sri G. Nageswara Rao, learned counsel for the appellants, submits that the cause in the civil miscellaneous appeal does not survive for adjudication.

Recording the submission of learned counsel appearing for the appellants, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.

__________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 23.10.2025 KAS

JS,J

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM

CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 857/2012

Dated: 23.10.2025 KAS

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead