Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/28757/2025 of DAYAM YESU BABU Vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH on 22 October 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] THURSDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 28757/2025 Between: 1. DAYAM YESU BABU, S/O ADI NARAYANA,

APHC010552282025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

THURSDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF OCTOBER

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM

WRIT PETITION NO: 28757/2025

Between:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. DAYAM YESU BABU, S/O ADI NARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, R/O D. NO. 3-6, GANDHI NAGAR, BURUGUPUDI VILLAGE KIRLAMPUDI MANDAL, KAKINADA DISTRICT.

...PETITIONER AND

1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPLESECRETARY,

ENDOWMENTDEPARTMENT,

A.P. SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

2. COMMISSIONER OF ENDOWMENTS, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH GOLLAPUDI, VIJAYAWADA

3. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF ENDOWMENTS, KAKINADA

4. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF ENDOWMENT, KAKINADA

5. SRI VENKATESWARA SWAMY VARI TEMPLE, SRI PARAVASTHU AJHAGHYA MANAVALLA JEEYAR SWAMY VARI MATAM REP. BY ITS EXECUTIVE OFFICER, TALLURU, GANDEPALLI MANDAL, KAKINADA DISTRICT

...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ

JS, J W.P.No.28757 of 2025

order or direction that a) Declaring the action of the respondents taking steps to dispossess the petitioner from the land to an extent Ac. 2.80 cents in survey No. t81/1 and 187/1, situated at Marripaka village, Jaggampeta Mandal as illegal and in contravention of Rule 3 of AP Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowment Lease of Agricultural Land Rules 2003.

b) Declare the 5th respondent notice dated 10-06-2025 as illegal in contravention of the procedure contemplated under Rule 3, 4 and 5 of the AP Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowment Lease of Agricultural Land Rules 2003 and also violation of principles of natural justice.

c) Declare the action of the respondents taking steps to evict the petitioner in contravention of the procedure contemplated under Section 82, 83, 84 and 85 of AP Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowment Act 1987.

b) To directing the official respondents to conduct enquiry for declaring the petitioner as landless poor person/small farmer and provide all the benefits under Rules 3,4,5 and 6 of the AP Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowment Lease of Agricultural Land Rules 2003 including permit the petitioner to purchase the land under the cultivation of the petitioner in respect of Ac. 2.80 cents in survey No. 181/1 and 187/1, situated at Marripaka village, JaggampetaMandal, East Godavari District, and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the official respondents not to dispossess the petitioner from the land under petitioners cultivation for an extent of Ac. 2.80 cents in survey No. 181/1 and 187/1, situated at Marripaka village, Jaggampeta Mandal, Kakinada District, pending disposal of the enquiry under Section 82,83,84 r/w Rule 3,4,5 of AP Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions Act and Rules and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. R K ACHARYULU Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR ENDOWMENTS

JS, J W.P.No.28757 of 2025

The Court made the following ORDER:

Sri P. Girish Kumar, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned standing counsel appearing for the respondent/temple have consented to dispose of the Writ Petition at the stage of admission.

2. W.P. No. 13921 of 2015, which was disposed of by this Court on 08.01.2025, directing the respondents not to dispossess the petitioners without following the due procedure as contemplated under law.

3. Learned Senior Counsel submits that the petitioner is listed at Serial No.6 in the array of petitioners in W.P. No.13921 of 2015.

4. Learned Senior Counsel further submits that the petitioner has submitted his explanation in response to the show cause notice dated 10.06.2025.

5. In view of the same, this Court feels it appropriate to dispose of the Writ Petition by directing the respondents to consider the explanation submitted by the petitioner on 18.07.2025 made to the respondents. However, the respondents are directed to provide the petitioner with a fair opportunity before issuing or passing appropriate orders.

6. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of.No order as to costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.

__________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date: 23.10.2025 SCH

JS, J

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM

WRIT PETITION NO: 28757/2025

Date: 23.10.2025 SCH

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead