Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/28592/2025 of DOVA ANIL KUMAR Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, on 15 October 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION NO: 28592 Between: 1. DOVA ANIL KUMAR, D/O.BHASKARA RAO, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, OWNER OF TRACTOR AND ITS

APHC010553172025

IN THE H

(

THURSDAY, T

TWO TH

THE HONOURABLE

WRIT P

Between:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. DOVA ANIL KUMAR YEARS, OWNER OF PESARLANKA, BHA 522257.

2. GORIKAPUDI SADHU YEARS, OWNER OF AMUDARLANKA,NAD

1. THE STATE OF AN SECRETARY,

M SECRETARIAT BUIL DISTRICT-522237.

2. THE TAHSILDAR, CH

3. THE STATION HOUS KRISHNA DISTRICT. Petition under Article circumstances stated in th pleased topleased to issue one in the nature of Wr Respondent in seizing the HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER HOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT E SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDA PETITION NO: 28592 OF 2025 R, D/O.BHASKARA RAO, AGED A F TRACTOR AND ITS TRAILER H. TTIPROLU MANDAL, BAPATIA DI ULU,, S/O.KOTESWARA RAO, AGED A F TRACTOR AND ITS TRAILER, H DAKUDURU, KRISHNA DISTRICT-5211 ...PETIT AND NDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS P MINES AND GEOLOGY DEPA DINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATH HALLAPALLI, KRISHNA DISTRICT. SE OFFICER, CHALLAPALLI POLICE ...RESPON 226 of the Constitution of India praying e affidavit filed therewith, the High Co e an appropriate order or direction more rit of Mandamus declaring the action Tractor bearing No.AP39WB9308 and

AVA ABOUT 37 NO.2-164, STRICT - ABOUT 47 H.NO.2-87,

126. TIONER(S) PRINCIPAL ARTMENT, HI, GUTUR STATION, NDENT(S): g that in the urt may be particularly of the 3rd its Trailer

No.AP39UL6607 of the 1st Petitioner and Tractor bearing NO.APUZ7318 and its Trailer of the 2nd Petitioner, in connection with FIR No.295 of 2025 without following the procedure known to the law under APMMC Rules, 1966 as illegal, irregular, arbitrary and contrary to the procedure established by law and against to the principles of natural justice and violative of fundamental rights guaranteed under Articles 14, 21 and 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to release the above said vehicles of the Petitioners forthwith in the interest of justice and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents to release the Tractor bearing NO.AP39WB9308 and its Trailer No.AP39UL6607 of the 1st Petitioner and Tractor bearing No.APUZ7318 and its Trailer of the 2nd Petitioner pending disposal of the above writ petition in the interest of justice and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):

1. B JAYA PRABHAKARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR REVENUE

2. GP FOR MINES AND GEOLOGY

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION NO: 28592 OF 2025 The Court made the following order:

The writ petition is filed challenging the action of the 3rd respondent in seizing the Tractor bearing No.AP 39 WB 9308 and its Trailer No.AP 39 UL 6607 of the 1st Petitioner and Tractor bearing No.AP UZ 7318 and its Trailer of the 2nd Petitioner, in connection with FIR No.295 of 2025, without following the procedure under the Andhra Pradesh Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1966.

2. Heard Sri B.Jaya Prabhakara Rao, learned counsel for the petitioners and Smt. Sudeepthi Potluri, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Mines and Geology appearing for the respondents. With the consent of both the learned counsel, the writ petition is disposed of at the stage of admission.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners contended that the petitioners have been using the subject vehicles for agricultural and commercial purposes only. When the vehicles were at Krishna River Ramp, Amudarlanka Village, Challapalli Mandal, the 3rd respondent herein has seized the vehicles alleging that the petitioners have been transporting sand without valid documents.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that the 3rd respondent has illegally seized the vehicles of the petitioners and registered FIR No.295 of 2025 under Section 303(2) Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, 27 Andhra Pradesh Water, Land and Trees Act, 2002. Hence, he prays the Court to direct the respondents to release the vehicles. In support of his contentions, the learned counsel for the petitioners relies on a decision of this Court in

W.P.No.20122 of 2025, prays the Court to dispose of the Writ Petition in terms of the said order. He further relies on G.O.Ms.No.100 dated 26.06.2025.

5. The relevant clauses of Clause 19(a) of the said G.O.Ms.No.100 Industries and Commerce (Mines-II), Department, dated 26.06.2025, reads as follows: Q. Offences and Penalties:

i. In case of the vehicles engaged in illegal/ un-authorized excavation in the prohibited areas (i.e., within 500 meters from the Ground water structures, Bridges, Dams, Railway lines and cross drainage structures etc.), transportation of sand outside the State and found transporting sand without valid Sand Way bill /invoice shall be penalized as follows; Vehicle Type First Time (In Rs.) Second Time (In Rs.) Tractor Upto 10,000/- Rs.10,001/- to 20,000/- Lorry fitted with upto 10 tires capacity Upto 25,000/- Rs.25,001/- to 50,000/- Lorry fitted with above 10 tires Upto 50,000/- Rs.50,001/- to 1,00,000/- Machinery Upto 50,000/- Rs.50,001/- to 1,00,000/-

Thus, he argues that the authorities cannot seize the vehicle for any alleged violations, they could, at the best levy only penalties.

6. Considering the submissions of both the learned counsel and upon perusing the material on record, the Writ Petition is disposed of in terms of the order passed in W.P.No.20122 of 2025, dated 01.08.2025 directing the respondent authorities to pass appropriate orders in terms of clause 19(a), of G.O.Ms.No.100, Industries and Commerce (Mines-III), Department, dated

26.06.2025, for levying penalty if any. After levy of penalty, and on payment of such penalty, the seized vehicles shall be released by the 3rd respondent on producing of the receipt of such payment and ownership documents of the vehicles to the satisfaction of the 3rd respondent. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall also stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA

Date: 16.10.2025 BSK

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA

WRIT PETITION NO: 28592 OF 2025

Date: 16.10.2025 BSK

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead