Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/43871/2017 of Mekala Venkata Sudhakar Babu, Vs Union of India, on 14 October 2025
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] WEDNESDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 43871/2017 Between: 1. MEKALA VENKATA SUDHAKAR BABU,, S/O.SRI M.V.V.SUBBA RAO,
APHC010928312017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY,THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 43871/2017
Between:
1. MEKALA VENKATA SUDHAKAR BABU,, S/O.SRI M.V.V.SUBBA RAO, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O.D.NO.26/91, ARAVAGUDEM, BUTTAIPET, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA
DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. UNION OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF EXTERNAL AFFAIRS, REP.BY THE
SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS, NEW DELHI.
2. REGIONAL PASSPORT AUTHORITY, REP.BY ITS REGIONAL
PASSPORT OFFICER, VISAKHAPATNA NEAR P.F.OFFICE, BESIDE
RYTHU BAZAR, MARRIPALEM VUDA LAYOUT, NAD POST, VISAKHAPATNAM, ANDHRA PRADESH.
3. REGIONAL
PASSPORT
OFFICE,
REP.BY
ITS
REGIONAL
PASSPORT OFFICER, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT, ANDHRA
PRADESH.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ of Mandamus, or any other appropriate writ, order or declaration declaring the Letter Ref.No.CNO/306353339/17, dated 24.11.2017
issued by the 3rd Respondent as illegal, arbitrary and violation of principle of natural Justice and set aside the same
IA NO: 1 OF 2017(WPMP 54404 OF 2017
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to interim stay of all further proceedings pursuant to the Letter Ref.No.CNO/306353339/17, dated 24-11-2017 issued by the 3rd Respondent, pending disposal of the above writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. B V ANJANEYULU
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. S SIVA KUMARI
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication.
Recording the submission of learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date: 15.10.2025 SCH
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 43871/2017
Date: 15.10.2025 SCH