Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/12154/2010 of K.Rambhoopala Reddy Vs Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, on 13 October 2025
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] TUESDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 12154/2010 Between: 1. K.RAMBHOOPALA REDDY, S/O.K.GOLLA REDDY BUSINESS
APHC010706842010
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY,THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 12154/2010
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. K.RAMBHOOPALA REDDY, S/O.K.GOLLA REDDY BUSINESS H.NO.1/497, OPP: MUNROE'S CHOULTRY, GOOTY, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER AND
1. COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES, OFFICE SITUATED OPP EXHIBITION GROUNDS, NAMPALLY, HYDERABAD.
2. COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER, GOOTY CIRCLE, 1-498, GOOTY, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT.
3. DEPUTY COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER, GOOTY CIRCLE, 1-498, GOOTY, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toissue a writ order or orders more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the first respondent in so far as issuing proceedings bearing No. CCT's Ref.No.G3/1241/2001 dated 5.8.2009 as amounting to highly arbitrary, illegal, unconstitutional and consequently to call for the records pertaining to file in reference No.CCT's Ref.No.G3/1241/2001 dated 5.8.2009 and quash the said proceedings for they are illegal, unconstitutional and arbitrary; and pass. IA NO: 1 OF 2010(WPMP 15320 OF 2010
JS,J W.P.No.12154 /2010
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased suspend the operation of impugned proceeidngs passed in File No.G3/GAD/1241/2001 dated 5.8.2009 pending final disposal of the writ petition and pass. Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. GOPALA KRISHNA KALANIDHI Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR COMMERCIAL TAX
JS,J W.P.No.12154 /2010
The Court made the following ORDER:
Though notice was issued to the petitioner on 19.08.2025, the same was returned with an endorsement that “no such person in this address”.
Learned counsel for the respondents submits that the premises were vacated on 03.12.2002 after the excess rent was adjusted.
In view of the same, The Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date: 14.10.2025 SCH
JS,J
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 12154/2010
Date: 14.10.2025 SCH