Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/27701/2017 of S SRINIVASA RAO Vs SECRETARTY ( HOME) AND 2 OTHERS on 12 October 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] MONDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 27701/2017 Between: 1. S SRINIVASA RAO, S/O SEETHARAMAIAH, AGED
APHC010677312017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY,THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 27701/2017
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. S SRINIVASA RAO, S/O SEETHARAMAIAH, AGED 47 YEARS, OCC:AGRICULTURE, R/O H.NO.5-52A, POLICE STATION ROAD, PARCHUR VILLAGE 86 MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER AND
1. SECRETARTY HOME AND 2 OTHERS, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF HOME, SASTRY BHAVAN, NEW DELHI.
2. CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, REP. BY ITS DIRECTOR, CGO COMPLEX, LODHI ROAD, NEW DELHI.
3. THE JOINT DIRECTOR, CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, 3RD FLOOR, KENDRIYA SADAN, KOTI, HYDERABAD.
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toe Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd respondent and his officials in calling the petitioner to their office and manhandling him without following the procedure established under law as illegal and violation of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 3rd respondent and his officials not to call the petitioner to their office without issuing any notice and further directing them to investigate the petitioner, if necessary, in the presence his personal counsel
JS,J W.P.No.27701/2017
and pass such other order or orders as this Honble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. IA NO: 1 OF 2017(WPMP 34400 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 3rd respondent and his officials not to harass the petitioner in any manner, pending disposal of the writ petition and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. IA NO: 2 OF 2017(WPMP 53152 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 3rd respondent and their officials not to call the petitioner to attend their office otherwise allow him to accompany by his advocate to attend the office of the 3rd respondent for the purpose of investigation / enquiry Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. ANCHA PANDURANGA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA
2. K SURENDER ( SPL P P FOR CBI )
JS,J W.P.No.27701/2017
The Court made the following ORDER:
Sri Ancha Panduranga Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication.
Recording the submission of learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date: 13.10.2025 SCH
JS,J
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 27701/2017
Date: 13.10.2025 SCH