Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/23877/2013 of Sri. Pasumarthi Lakshminarayana Sastry Vs The South Central Railway, on 12 October 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] MONDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 23877/2013 Between: 1. SRI. PASUMARTHI LAKSHMINARAYANA SASTRY, S/O LATE.

APHC010730502013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

MONDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM

WRIT PETITION NO: 23877/2013

Between:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. SRI. PASUMARTHI LAKSHMINARAYANA SASTRY, S/O LATE. SRI.VENKATA SUBRAHMANYA SASTRY, HINDU,AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, RIO DOOR NO.4-111, G-01, SHEETAL APARTMENTS, MARUTHI NAGAR, MALKAJGIRI, MALKAJIGIRI, R.R.DISTRICT, HYDERABAD 500047

...PETITIONER AND

1. THE SOUTH CENTRAL RAILWAY, VIJAYAWADA DIVISION REP. BY THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER, VIJAYAWADA 520 001

2. THE ESTATE OFFICER, ADDITIONAL DIVISIONAL RAILWAY MANAGER , SOUTH CENTRAL RAILWAY, VIJAYAWADA-520001

3. UNION OF INDIA, REP.BY ITS SECRETARY SECRETARIAT, NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI

4. SMT GHATTAMANENI VIJAYA LAKSHMI, W/O UMA MAHESWARA RAO ,AGED 60YEARS, RESIDENT OF 21-11-90C, MADHURA NAGAR, VIJAYAWADA-11.

...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to pass an order, direction or writ Order particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the respondent No.1 in not handing over the vacant possession of vacant site an Ext of 392.4 1/2 Sq.

JS,J W.P.No.23877/2013

Yards in R.S. NO 11/1 N.T.S NO 17, Municipal Ward no 26 situated at Bhanu Nagar, Machavaram, Jagir, Vijayawada, Krishna dist., to the petitioners, is arbitrary, illegal and unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondent no.1 to remove encroachments and Railway pegs planted in the land and deliver vacant possession of the vacant site an Ext of 392.4 1/2 Sq. Yards in R.S. NO 11/1 N.T.S NO 17, Municipal Ward no 26 situated at Bhanu Nagar, Machavaram, Jagir, Vijayawada, Krishna dt. to the petitioners and also pass IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP 29355 OF 2013

in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent no.1 to remove encroachments and Railway pegs planted in the land and deliver vacant possession of the vacant site an Ext of 392.4 1/2 Sq. Yards in R.S. NO 11/1 N.T.S NO 17, Municipal Ward no 26 situated at Bhanu Nagar, Machavaram, Jagir, Vijayawada, Krishna dt. to the petitioners and also pass IA NO: 4 OF 2013(WPMP 130980 OF 2013

in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased To permit petitioner to come on record as petitioner No. 2 in the W.P As Well as I.As as the legal representative of the deceased petitioner Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. T VIDYA RANI Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. M UMA DEVI (CENTRAL GOVT COUNSEL)

2. P BHASKAR

3. KADARU PRABHAKAR RAO

JS,J W.P.No.23877/2013

The Court made the following ORDER:

No representation for the petitioner.

As there was no representation for the petitioner on 20.08.2025, the matter was directed to be listed on 03.09.2025. On 03.09.2025 also there was no representation for the petitioner. Hence, the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption “for dismissal”.

Today when the matter is called there is no representation for the petitioner. It appears that the petitioner is not interested to prosecute the case.

Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed as non-prosecution. No order as to costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.

__________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 13.10.2025 KAS

JS,J

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM

WRIT PETITION NO: 23877/2013

Dated: 13.10.2025 KAS

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead