Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/2232/2025 of Thanga Bala Krishna, Vs Sri Dr. Sreedhar Cherukuri on 9 October 2025
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] FRIDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2232/2025 Between: 1. THANGA BALA KRISHNA,, S/O BALA RAJU, AGED 32 YEARS, OCC- FP SHOP
APHC010429042025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY,THE TENTH DAY OF OCTOBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2232/2025
Between:
1. THANGA BALA KRISHNA,, S/O BALA RAJU, AGED 32 YEARS, OCC- FP SHOP DEALER (UNDER CANCELLATION) OF
F.P.SHOP
NO.
1112006,
SHIVAJI
NAGAR,
H/O.
MADAKALAVARIPALLI
VILLAGE,
GOPAVARAM
MANDAL
Y.S.R.KADAPA DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. SRI
DR
SREEDHAR
CHERUKURI,
THE
DISTRICT
COLLECTOR, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT.
2. SMT ADITI SINGH, THE JOINT COLLECTOR, YSR KADAPA
DISTRICT.
3. SRI K TRIBHUVAN REDDY, THE TAHSILDAR, GOPAVARAM
MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT
4. SRI TARAKANADHA REDDY, THE ASSISTANT SUPPLY
OFFICER (CIVIL SUPPLY) RAJAMPETA, YSR KADAPA
DISTRICT
...CONTEMNOR(S):
Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971
praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the Respondent herein for willfully and deliberately violating the order passed by this Honble Court in W.P.No.6597/2025, dated.18.3.2025 under Sections 10
to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 and pass
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. M SIVA KUMAR
Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1.
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri K. Raghu, learned counsel representing Sri M. Siva Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the respondents have complied with the orders dated 18.03.2025 passed by this Court in W.P.No.6597 of 2025.
2. In view of the same, no further orders are required in the present Contempt Case.
3. Accordingly, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
10th October, 2025 cbn
THE HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
CC No.2232 of 2025
10th October, 2025 cbn