Andhra Pradesh High Court
CMA/716/2011 of MABASHA Vs THE ENDOWMENTS DEPARTMENT & ANR on 9 October 2025
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] FRIDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 716/2011 Between: 1. MABASHA, S/O.ALLABAKASH MIAH, MUSLIM R/O.THOTA
APHC010162442011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY,THE TENTH DAY OF OCTOBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 716/2011
Between:
1. MABASHA, S/O.ALLABAKASH MIAH, MUSLIM R/O.THOTA
STREET, ORVAKAL [V] & [M], KURNOOL DISTRICT.
...APPELLANT
AND
1. THE ENDOWMENTS DEPARTMENT ANR, ENDOWMENTS
DEPARTMENTS O/O.KURNOOL.
2. THE MANAGER, SRI CHENNAKESAVA ANJANEYA SWAMY
TEMPLE O/O.ORVAKAL [V] & [M], KURNOOL DISTRICT.
3. PALA SUBBA REDDY, S/O AMMAYYAGARI PULLA REDDY, AGED MAJOR, OCCUPATION NOT KNOWN, R/O ORVAKAL
VILLAGE AND MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. IMPLEADED
VIDE C.O.DT 29.03.2012 IN CMAMP 2094/11
...RESPONDENT(S):
Appeal Under Section_____against orders
IA NO: 1 OF 2011(CMAMP 1310 OF 2011
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased suspend the operation of the judgement and decree in OA
No.1003/2010 [Old No.13/2009 D.C., Kurnool] dated 19.11.2010 on the file of the Endowments Tribunal, Hyderbad, pending disposal of the above appeal IA NO: 2 OF 2011(CMAMP 2094 OF 2011
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to implead the proposed respondent as Respondent No. 3
to the CMA and CMP
IA NO: 6 OF 2011(CMAMP 43544 OF 2011
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Appellant:
1. N MUKUND REDDY
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. DEVI SUBHASHINI ANNE SC For Endowments The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
JUDGMENT:
Despite the matter being listed today i.e., on 10.10.2025 under the caption ‘for Dismissal’, there is no representation for the appellant. Even on the earlier occasions, i.e., on 12.09.2025, 29.08.2025, 31.07.2025, 17.07.2025, and 26.06.2025, there was no representation for the appellant.
2. Therefore, it appears that the appellant has no interest to prosecute the case. Hence, this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
10th October, 2025 cbn
THE HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
CMA No.716 of 2011
10th October, 2025 cbn