Andhra Pradesh High Court
CMA/650/2011 of CHINNI SUBBA RAO Vs THE AP ENDOWMENTS TRIBUNAL & 3 ORS on 9 October 2025
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] FRIDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 650/2011 Between: 1. CHINNI SUBBA RAO, S/O.LATE C.C.SUBBA RAYUDU SETTY
APHC010225162011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY,THE TENTH DAY OF OCTOBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 650/2011
Between:
1. CHINNI SUBBA RAO, S/O.LATE C.C.SUBBA RAYUDU SETTY
R/O.D.NO.16/1243,
GANDHI
NAGAR,
OPP.SUNDARY
MAERKET, NELLORE.
...APPELLANT
AND
1. THE AP ENDOWMENTS TRIBUNAL 3 ORS, REP BY ITS
CHAIRMAN O/O.HYDERABAD.
2. ASST
COMMISSIONER,
ENDOWMENTS
DEPARTMENT
O/O.NELLORE.
3. ISPECT OF ENDOWMENTS, NELLORE DIVISION, NELLORE
4. THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER, SRI SARVODAYA EDUCATION
COLLEGE & PG CENTRE O/O.NELLORE.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Appeal Under Section_____against orders
IA NO: 2 OF 2011(CMAMP 7021 OF 2011
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased IA NO: 1 OF 2015(CMAMP 1068 OF 2015
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to expedite the hearing of the CMA.No. 650 of 2011 by fixing an early date
Counsel for the Appellant:
1. G VASANTHA RAYUDU
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. DEVI SUBHASHINI ANNE SC For Endowments The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
JUDGMENT:
Despite the matter being listed today i.e., on 10.10.2025 under the caption ‘for Dismissal’, there is no representation for the appellant. Even on the earlier occasions, i.e., on 12.09.2025, 29.08.2025, and 31.07.2025, there was no representation for the appellant.
2. Therefore, it appears that the appellant has no interest to prosecute the case. Hence, this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
10th October, 2025 cbn
THE HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
CMA No.650 of 2011
10th October, 2025 cbn