Andhra Pradesh High Court
CMA/502/2014 of D AMMAJI Vs THE ASST COMMISSIONR ENDOWMENTS & ANOTHER on 9 October 2025
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] FRIDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 502/2014 Between: 1. D AMMAJI, W/O RAMU, D.NO.15-176/2, MARUTHINAGAR,
APHC010521942014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY,THE TENTH DAY OF OCTOBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 502/2014
Between:
1. D AMMAJI, W/O RAMU, D.NO.15-176/2, MARUTHINAGAR, PRAHALADAPURAM POST, VISAKHAPATNAM.
...APPELLANT
AND
1. THE ASST COMMISSIONR ENDOWMENTS ANOTHER, VISAKHAPATNAM.
2. VARAHA
NARASIMHA
SWAMY
VARI
DEVASTHANAM,
SIMHACHALAM, VISAKHAPATNAM, REP BY ITS EXECUTIVE
OFFICER.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Appeal Under Section_____against ordersaggrieved by teh
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Judgement
and (Award and decree dt.01.03.2012 made in O.A.No.2004/2010 (O.A.No.36/2010 of DC-Vizag) on the file of A.P.Endowments Tribunal, Hyderabad receivewd on 24.04.2012 IA NO: 1 OF 2014(CMAMP 646 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased condone the delay of 618 days in re-presenting the CMA IA NO: 2 OF 2014(CMAMP 680 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in pursuant to Judgement (Award) and decree dated 1-3-2012 made in OA NO. 2004/2010 (O.A NO. 2004/2010 (O.A. No. 36/2010 of Dc-Vizag) on the file of A.P. Endowments Tribunal, Hyderabad, pending disposal of the appeal and to pass
Counsel for the Appellant:
1. MANOJ KUMAR AKULA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. CHINTAPALLI SRINIVAS The Court made the following:
JUDGMENT:
Despite the matter being listed today i.e., on 10.10.2025 under the caption ‘for Dismissal’, there is no representation for the appellant. Even on the earlier occasions, i.e., on 23.09.2025, 19.09.2025, 29.08.2025, and 25.07.2025, there was no representation for the appellant.
2. Therefore, it appears that the appellant has no interest to prosecute the case. Hence, this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
10th October, 2025 cbn
THE HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
CMA No.502 of 2014
10th October, 2025 cbn