Andhra Pradesh High Court
CMA/250/2012 of VYAMAJALA SUBRAHMANYAM & 2 ORS Vs THE ENDOWMENTS DEPARTMENTS & 5 ORS on 8 October 2025
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] THURSDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 250/2012 Between: 1. VYAMAJALA SUBRAHMANYAM & 2 ORS, S/O.LATE SRI
APHC010583162012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF OCTOBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 250/2012
Between:
1. VYAMAJALA SUBRAHMANYAM & 2 ORS, S/O.LATE SRI
PULLAIAH SASTRY R/O.VARIGONDA VILLAGE AND POST, T.P.GUDURU MADNAL, NELLORE DISTRICT.
2. V.NAGARAJU,
S/O.SUBRAHMANYAM
R/O.VARIGONDA
VILLAGE AND POST, T.P.GUDURU MADNAL, NELLORE
DISTRICT.
3. VYAMAJALA
JAGAN
MOHAN
SARMA,
S/O.SIDDAIAH
R/O.VARIGONDA VILLAGE AND POST, T.P.GUDURU MADNAL, NELLORE DISTRICT.
...APPELLANT(S)
AND
1. THE ENDOWMENTS DEPARTMENTS 5 ORS, ENDOWMENTS
DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF A.P. O/O.TILAK ROAD, HYDERABAD.
2. THE REGIONAL JOINT COMMISSIONER, EMDOWMENTS
DEPARTMENT O/O.TIRUAPTI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.
3. THE
DEPUTY
COMMISSIONER,
EMDOWMENTS
DEPARTMENT O/O.GUNTUR.
4. THE
ASSISTANT
COMMISSIONER,
EMDOWMENTS
DEPARTMENT O/O.NELLORE.
5. SRI RAMA MANDIRAM, REP BY ITS EXECUTIVE OFFICER
C/O.VARIGONDA VILLAGE, THOTAPALLI GUDURU MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT.
6. GANDAVARAPU SYAMALAMMA, D/O.SUBBARAMI REDDY
R/O.VARIGONDA VILLAGE, T.P. GUDURU MANDAL, SPSR
NELLORE DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Appeal Under Section_____against orders
IA NO: 1 OF 2012(CMAMP 452 OF 2012
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased grant leave to the appellants to file the present appeal before this Hon'ble court against the orders passed on 17.04.2010
passed by the 3rd respondent i.e., the Deputy Commissioner of Endowments Departments, Guntur IA NO: 2 OF 2012(CMAMP 523 OF 2012
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay the operation of the order passed on 17-4-2010 in OA NO. 15 of 2009 by the 3rd respondent, pending disposal of the CMA
and pass
IA NO: 3 OF 2012(CMAMP 1580 OF 2012
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased vacate theinterim order dated 28-3-2012 made in CMA.MP.NO.523 of 2012 in CMA.No. 250 of 2012
IA NO: 1 OF 2013(CMAMP 1948 OF 2013
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim order dt.28-03-2012 made in CMA
MP.No.523/2012 in CMA No.250/2012
IA NO: 1 OF 2014(CMAMP 390 OF 2014
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim orders dated 28.03.2012 in CMA MP
No.523/2012 in CMA No.250/2012 and to pass IA NO: 2 OF 2014(CMAMP 555 OF 2014
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pleased to condone the delay 29 days in filing the restoration petition against the dismissal order dated:06.02.2014 made inCMAMP NO.1948/2013 in CMA NO.250/2012 and pass
IA NO: 3 OF 2014(CMAMP 798 OF 2014
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to set aside the order dated 6-2-2014 and restore the CMA
No. 250 of 2012 in CMAMP NO. 1948 of 2013 to file and pass Counsel for the Appellant(S):
1. V S R MURTHY
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR APPEALS
2. V T M PRASAD
3. T C KRISHNAN
4. .
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
JUDGMENT:
Learned counsel for the appellants appeared virtually and sought permission of this Court to withdraw the present civil miscellaneous appeal.
2. Permission is accorded.
3. Accordingly, this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs.
As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
9th October, 2025 cbn
THE HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
CMA No.250 of 2012
9th October, 2025
cbn