Andhra Pradesh High Court

CMA/250/2012 of VYAMAJALA SUBRAHMANYAM & 2 ORS Vs THE ENDOWMENTS DEPARTMENTS & 5 ORS on 8 October 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] THURSDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 250/2012 Between: 1. VYAMAJALA SUBRAHMANYAM & 2 ORS, S/O.LATE SRI

APHC010583162012

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

THURSDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF OCTOBER

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM

CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 250/2012

Between:

1. VYAMAJALA SUBRAHMANYAM & 2 ORS, S/O.LATE SRI

PULLAIAH SASTRY R/O.VARIGONDA VILLAGE AND POST, T.P.GUDURU MADNAL, NELLORE DISTRICT.

2. V.NAGARAJU,

S/O.SUBRAHMANYAM

R/O.VARIGONDA

VILLAGE AND POST, T.P.GUDURU MADNAL, NELLORE

DISTRICT.

3. VYAMAJALA

JAGAN

MOHAN

SARMA,

S/O.SIDDAIAH

R/O.VARIGONDA VILLAGE AND POST, T.P.GUDURU MADNAL, NELLORE DISTRICT.

...APPELLANT(S)

AND

1. THE ENDOWMENTS DEPARTMENTS 5 ORS, ENDOWMENTS

DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF A.P. O/O.TILAK ROAD, HYDERABAD.

2. THE REGIONAL JOINT COMMISSIONER, EMDOWMENTS

DEPARTMENT O/O.TIRUAPTI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.

3. THE

DEPUTY

COMMISSIONER,

EMDOWMENTS

DEPARTMENT O/O.GUNTUR.

4. THE

ASSISTANT

COMMISSIONER,

EMDOWMENTS

DEPARTMENT O/O.NELLORE.

5. SRI RAMA MANDIRAM, REP BY ITS EXECUTIVE OFFICER

C/O.VARIGONDA VILLAGE, THOTAPALLI GUDURU MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT.

6. GANDAVARAPU SYAMALAMMA, D/O.SUBBARAMI REDDY

R/O.VARIGONDA VILLAGE, T.P. GUDURU MANDAL, SPSR

NELLORE DISTRICT.

...RESPONDENT(S):

Appeal Under Section_____against orders

IA NO: 1 OF 2012(CMAMP 452 OF 2012

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased grant leave to the appellants to file the present appeal before this Hon'ble court against the orders passed on 17.04.2010

passed by the 3rd respondent i.e., the Deputy Commissioner of Endowments Departments, Guntur IA NO: 2 OF 2012(CMAMP 523 OF 2012

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay the operation of the order passed on 17-4-2010 in OA NO. 15 of 2009 by the 3rd respondent, pending disposal of the CMA

and pass

IA NO: 3 OF 2012(CMAMP 1580 OF 2012

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased vacate theinterim order dated 28-3-2012 made in CMA.MP.NO.523 of 2012 in CMA.No. 250 of 2012

IA NO: 1 OF 2013(CMAMP 1948 OF 2013

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim order dt.28-03-2012 made in CMA

MP.No.523/2012 in CMA No.250/2012

IA NO: 1 OF 2014(CMAMP 390 OF 2014

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim orders dated 28.03.2012 in CMA MP

No.523/2012 in CMA No.250/2012 and to pass IA NO: 2 OF 2014(CMAMP 555 OF 2014

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pleased to condone the delay 29 days in filing the restoration petition against the dismissal order dated:06.02.2014 made inCMAMP NO.1948/2013 in CMA NO.250/2012 and pass

IA NO: 3 OF 2014(CMAMP 798 OF 2014

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to set aside the order dated 6-2-2014 and restore the CMA

No. 250 of 2012 in CMAMP NO. 1948 of 2013 to file and pass Counsel for the Appellant(S):

1. V S R MURTHY

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR APPEALS

2. V T M PRASAD

3. T C KRISHNAN

4. .

The Court made the following:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

JUDGMENT:

Learned counsel for the appellants appeared virtually and sought permission of this Court to withdraw the present civil miscellaneous appeal.

2. Permission is accorded.

3. Accordingly, this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs.

As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.

__________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM

9th October, 2025 cbn

THE HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM

CMA No.250 of 2012

9th October, 2025

cbn

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead