Andhra Pradesh High Court
CMA/980/2015 of B VENKATA KRISHNAIAH, KRISHNA DIST Vs LINGAMANENI NAGENDRAMMA [DIED] & ANR on 8 October 2025
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] THURSDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 980/2015 Between: 1. B VENKATA KRISHNAIAH, KRISHNA DIST, S/O
APHC010331862015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF OCTOBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 980/2015
Between:
1. B
VENKATA
KRISHNAIAH,
KRISHNA
DIST,
S/O
ADINARAYANA,
R/O
CHINAMUTHEVI
VILLAGE
MUVVA
MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
...APPELLANT
AND
1. LINGAMANENI NAGENDRAMMA DIED ANR, -
2. LINGAMANENI VEERA RAGHAVAIAH, S/O LATE APPARAO, R/O PEDAMUTHEVI VILLAGE MOVVA MANDAL KRISHNA
DISTRICT
...RESPONDENT(S):
Appeal Under Section_____against ordersaggrieved by the Order dt.10.09.2015 in EA NO.185 of 2012 in EP NO.52 of 2010 in OS NO.82
of 2002 on the file of the Court of the Senior civil Judge at Avanigadda, Krishna District IA NO: 1 OF 2015(CMAMP 2044 OF 2015
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in including confirmation of sale in EP NO.52 of 2010 in OS NO.82 of 2002 on the file of the Court of the Senior civil Judge at Avanigadda, Krishna District pending disposal of the above Appeal in this Hon'ble Court and pass
Counsel for the Appellant:
1. SAI GANGADHAR CHAMARTY
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
JUDGMENT:
Sri K. Raghu, learned counsel representing Sri Sai Gangadhar Chamarthy, learned counsel for the appellant, submits that the cause in the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal does not survive for adjudication and the appeal has become infructuous.
Recording the said submission of learned counsel for the appellant, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.
As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
9th October, 2025 cbn
THE HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
CMA No.980 of 2015
9th October, 2025 cbn