Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/1542/2025 of TADI NAGA MOHAN REDDY Vs G SAI PRASAD IAS on 7 October 2025
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] WEDNESDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1542/2025 Between: 1. TADI NAGA MOHAN REDDY, S/O. NARAYANA REDDY, AGED 51 YEAI'S,
APHC010312042025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY,THE EIGHTH DAY OF OCTOBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1542/2025
Between:
1. TADI NAGA MOHAN REDDY, S/O. NARAYANA REDDY, AGED
51 YEAI'S, OCC CONTRACTOR, R/O D NO 8/1088, SATHI
SOMI REDDY COMPLEX, NEAR KALA VENKATA RAO
STATUE, RING ROAD, RAVULAPALEM, EAST GODAVARI
DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. G SAI PRASAD IAS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT
OF
IRRIGATION
(WRD),
SECRETARIAT
BUILDINGS,
VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.(RL)
2. D RAMA GOPAL, THE CHIEF ENGINEER, NORTH COAST, VISAKHAPATNAM. (R2)
3. K V N SWARNA KUMAR, THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER
(WRD), IRRIGATION CIRCLE, VISAKHAPATNAM.
4. M VENKATA RAMANA, THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (WRD), VIZIANAGARAM DIVISION, VIZIANAGARAM. (R4)
5. PEEYUSH
KUMAR
L
A
S,
PRINCIPAL
SECRETARY,
DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND PLANNING, SECRETARIAT
BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
(R5).
...CONTEMNOR(S):
Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971
praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to Pleased to direct the notices to the respondents herein and punish the Respondents under Sec. 10 to 12
of Contempt of Court Act, 1971 for deliberate, intentional and willful violation of the orders of this HonBle High Court dated 27.03.2025
passed in W.P. No. 6696 of 2024 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may
be pleased Pleased to dispense with the filing of certified copy of the order W.P.No.6696 of 2024 dt: 27.03.2025 and pass s Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. SURESH KUMAR REDDY KALAVA
Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. NAGARAJU PULLAGURA
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondents have complied with the orders dated 27.03.2025 passed by this Court in W.P.No.6696 of 2024.
2. In view of the same, no further orders are required in the present Contempt Case.
3. Accordingly, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
8th October, 2025 cbn
THE HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
CC No.1542 of 2025
8th October, 2025 cbn