Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/16161/2019 of Chilukuri Ayyanna, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh on 7 October 2025
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3458] WEDNESDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION NO: 16161/2019 Between: 1. CHILUKURI AYYANNA,, S/O. RAMA KRISHNA AGE 55 YEARS, R/O.
APHC010341762019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF OCTOBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA
WRIT PETITION NO: 16161/2019
Between:
1. CHILUKURI AYYANNA,, S/O. RAMA KRISHNA AGE 55 YEARS, R/O.
FLAT
NO.
301,
GTP
TOWERS
AWARAOPET
ROAD,
JANGAREDDYGUDEM WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT
2. CHILUKURI SUDHA RANI,, W/O. AYYANNA AGE 51 YEARS, R/O.
FLAT
NO.
301,
GTP
TOWERS
AWARAOPET
ROAD,
JANGAREDDYGUDEM WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT
...PETITIONER(S)
AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY COMMISSIONER, ENDOWMENTS DEPARTMENT NEAR POLICE CONTROL ROOM, GOVERNOR PETA VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT
2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF ENDOWMENTS, KAKINADA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT
3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT AT
ELURU
4. SRI VENUGOPALA SWAMY TEMPLE, JANGAREDDYGUDEM, WEST
GODAVARI DISTRICT REPRESENTED BY ITS EXECUTIVE OFFICER
5. THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER, SRI VENUGOPALA SWAMY TEMPLE
JANGAREDDYGUDEM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue order, direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 4th respondent in resorting to demolish the shops situated in D. No. 11-9-754, Aswaraopeta Road, Jangareddygudem and resorting to dispossess the petitioners from the land admeasuring 149
Sq.y situated in Sy. No. 385 of Jangareddygudem belongs to the 1st petitioner and the land admeasuring 205 Sq.y situated in Sy. No. 385 of Jangareddygudem belongs to the 2nd petitioner without any authority and without following due process of law as illegal, arbitrary, highhanded, malafidy, ultra-virus, against to the principles of natural justice and contrary to the procedure established by law apart from being violative of under Article 300-A
of the Constitution of India and consequentially direct the respondents not to demolish the shops situated in D. No. 11-9-754, Aswaraopeta Road, Jangareddygudem and not to dispossess the petitioners from the above lands without following due process of law in the interest of justice and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2019
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to demolish the shops situated in D. No. 11-9-754, Aswaraopeta Road, Jangareddygudem and not to dispossess the petitioners from the land admeasuring 149 Sq.y situated in Sy. No. 385 of Jangareddygudem belongs to the 1st petitioner and the land admeasuring 205
Sq.y situated in Sy. No. 385 of Jangareddygudem belongs to the 2nd petitioner pending disposal of the above writ petition in the interest of justice and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2022
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim order granted in I.A.No.1/2019 in W.P.No.16161 of 2019, dated 17.10.2019 and dismiss the main Writ Petition as devoid of merits and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. KAMBHAMPATI RAMESH BABU
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR ENDOWMENTS (AP)
2. PULIPATI RADHIKA
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
It is stated by Sri Kambhampati Ramesh Babu, learned counsel for the petitioners that the issue raised in the Writ Petition does not survive for further adjudication.
2. Recording the said submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, all pending miscellaneous applications shall stand closed. _______________________________ JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA
Date: 08.10.2025 MSI
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA
WRIT PETITION NO: 16161/2019
Date: 08.10.2025 MSI