Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/1544/2025 of Tadi Naga Mohan Reddy, Vs G. Sai Prasad IAS, on 7 October 2025
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] WEDNESDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1544/2025 Between: 1. TADI NAGA MOHAN REDDY,, S/O. NARAYANA REDDY, AGED 51 YEARS,
APHC010311992025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY,THE EIGHTH DAY OF OCTOBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1544/2025
Between:
1. TADI NAGA MOHAN REDDY,, S/O. NARAYANA REDDY, AGED
51 YEARS, OCC - CONTRACTOR, R/O D NO 8/1088, SATHI
SOMI REDDY COMPLEX, NEAR KALA VENKATA RAO
STATUE, RING ROAD, RAVULAPALEM, EAST GODAVARI
DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. G SAI PRASAD IAS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT
OF
IRRIGATION
(WRD),
SECRETARIAT
BUILDINGS,
VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. (RL)
2. D RAMA GOPAL, THE CHIEF ENGINEER, NORTH COAST, VISAKHAPATNAM. (R2)
3. K V N SWARNA KUMAR, THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER
(WRD), IRRIGATION CIRCLE, VISAKHAPATNAM.
4. M VENKATA RAMANA M E M E E, THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
(WRD), VIZIANAGARAM DIVISION, VIZIANAGARAM. (R4)
5. PEEYUSH
KUMAR
IAS,
PRINCIPAL
SECRETARY,
DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND. PLANNING, SECRETARIAT
BUILDINGS,
VELAGAPUDI,
AMARAVATHI,
GUNTUR
DISTRICT. (R5)
...CONTEMNOR(S):
Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971
praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to may be pleased to direct the notices to the respondents herein and punish the Respondents under Sec. 10 to 12 of Contempt of Court Act, 1971 for deliberate, intentional and willful violation of the orders of this Honble High Court dated 27.03.2025
passed in W.P. No. 6771 of 2024 and pass
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. SURESH KUMAR REDDY KALAVA
Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. SOMA RAJU YELISETTI
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondents have complied with the orders dated 27.03.2025 passed by this Court in W.P.No.6771 of 2024.
2. In view of the same, no further orders are required in the present Contempt Case.
3. Accordingly, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
8th October, 2025 cbn
THE HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
CC No.1544 of 2025
8th October, 2025 cbn