Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/5470/2016 of M/S. GAJANANA DIGITAL CABLE NETWORK, ANANTAPURAM DIST Vs SUPERINTENDENT OF POSTS, ANANTAPURAM DIST & 3 OT on 6 October 2025
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] TUESDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 5470/2016 Between: 1. M/S. GAJANANA DIGITAL CABLE NETWORK, ANANTAPURAM DIST,
APHC010396212016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF OCTOBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 5470/2016
Between:
1. M/S. GAJANANA DIGITAL CABLE NETWORK, ANANTAPURAM
DIST, REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR B. GANELH
NAIDU, S/O. B. MANCHENA, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, R/O.
HINDUPUR ROAD, KALYANDURG, ANAILTAPURAM DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. SUPERINTENDENT OF POSTS ANANTAPURAM DIST 3 OT, ANANTAPURAMU, ANANTAPURAMU DISTRICT.
2. THE
HEAD
POSTMASTER
HEAD
POST
OFFICE
ANANTAPURARNU, ANANTAPURAMU DISTRICT.
3. THE
POSTMASTER
GUNTAKAL
HEAD
OFFICE,
ANANTAPURAMU DISTRICT.
4. THE TAHSILDAR KALYANDURG ANANTAPURAMU DISTRICT,
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toIssue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declare the action of the 3rd respondent in cancelling the license for operating the cable network in Kalyandurg area by memo No.H/Cable TV/DIgs./BBN/Guntakal/HO, dated 29-01-2016, consequently set aside the same, forth with, and pass be
pleased
suspend
the
memo
No.H/Cable
TV/DIgs./BBN/Guntakal/HO, dated 29-01-2016 issued by the 3rd Respondent, by continuing the petitioner to operate the cable network services, pending disposal of the main writ petition, and pass be pleased be pleased
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. K SRINIVAS
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. NAMAVARAPU R RAO(CENTRAL GOVT COUNSEL)
2. GP FOR REVENUE (AP)
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication and the writ petition has become infructuous.
Recording the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.
As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
7th October, 2025 cbn
THE HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WP No.5470 of 2016
7th October, 2025 cbn