Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/23191/2016 of Antcha Chandu Babu, s/o Venkateswararao Vs The Manager, State Bank of India, Sagar Road Branch, on 6 October 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] TUESDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 23191/2016 Between: 1. ANTCHA CHANDU BABU, S/O VENKATESWARARAO, R/O. GANIKAPADU. 2.

APHC010222342016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

TUESDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF OCTOBER

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM

WRIT PETITION NO: 23191/2016

Between:

1. ANTCHA CHANDU BABU, S/O VENKATESWARARAO, R/O.

GANIKAPADU.

2. ANTCHA

SREELAKSHMI,

W/O

ANKAMARAO,,

R/O

GANIKAPADU

3. ANTCHA

KUSUMAKUMARI,

W/O

SRINIVAS,,

R/O

GANIKAPADU

4. ANTCHA ANNAPURNA, W/O RAMBABU,, R/O GANIKAPADU

5. BOLLINENI HARIBABU, S/O SHESHAIAH,, R/O GANIKAPADU

6. NIMMAGADDA NAGARAJA KUMARI, W/O NARASAIAH,, R/O

GANIKAPADU

7. THE CHITYALA PACS, REP BY ITS PRESIDENT/CHAIRMAN

NARRA, MOHANREDDY, S/O NARAYANAREDDY, AGE 58

YRS, R/O VATTIMARPHY, CHITYAL MANDAL, NALGONDA

DIST.

8. THE SHALI GOWRARAM PACS, REP BY ITS PRESIDENT, LOKASANI, RANGAREDDY, S/O DASARADHA REDDY, AGE

45 YRS, R/O PERAKA KONDARAM , SHALI GOWRARAM

MANDAL, NALLAGONDA DISTRICT.

9. THE KETHAPALLI PACS, REP BY ITS PRESIDENT, BOJJA

CHINNA, VENKULU, R/O RAMACHARYULU, AGE 40 YRS, R/O VINUPAMULA, KETHEPALLI MANDAL, NALLAGONDA

DIST.

10. THE THATIKALLU PACS, REP BY ITS PRESIDENT, MADHA

ELIKA,, S/O SATTAIAH, AGE 30 YRS, R/O OGODU, NAKARIKALLU MANDAL, NALLAGONDA DISTRICT.

11. 'THE RAMANNAPETA PACS, REP BY ITS MEMBER, PITTA

KRISHNA, REDDY, S/O SRINIVASREDDY, AGE 35 YRS, R/O

KAKKIRENI,

RAMANNAPETA

MANDAL,

NALLAGONDA

DISTRICT.

12. THE

VALIGONDA

PACS,

REP

BY

ITS

PRESIDENT,

SURAKANTI, VENKATAREDDY, S/O NARSIREDDY, AGE 63

YRS, R/O SANGAM, VALIGONDA MANDAL , NALGONDA

DISTRICT.

13. CHALLA HANUMANTHARAO, S/O VENKATESWARLU,, R/O

PATLAVEEDU.

14. JAVVISETTY ADINARAYANA, S/O VENKATESWARLU,, R/O

GUNDLAPADU.

...PETITIONER(S)

AND

1. THE MANAGER STATE BANK OF INDIA SAGAR ROAD

BRANCH, MACHERLA, MACHERLA MANDAL, GUNTUR

DISTRICT.

2. THE CANADA BANK MACHERLA BRANCH MACHERLA

MACHERLA, MANDAL, GUNTURU DISTRICT.

3. THE MANAGER CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA GOTTIPADU

BRANCH, GOTTIPADU, PRATHIPADU MANDAL, GUNTUR

DISTRICT.

4. THE

CHIEF

EXECUTIVE

OFFICER

THE

NALLAGONDA

DISTRICT, CO-OPERATIVE CENTRAL BANK LTD, NALGONDA

, NALGONDA DIST.

...RESPONDENT(S):

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ Order or orders more particularly in the nature of the Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in deducting the crop insurance premium from the crop loans released and to be released to the Petitioners/Members of Petitioners at the rate of 1% to 42.5 % towards crop Insurance premium in the khariff and rabbi seasons 2016 to 2017 as illegal, arbitrary , violation of provisions of Constitution of India and Contract Act and declare the same as optional IA NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP 28551 OF 2016

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents not to deduct the any Crop insurance premium from the petitioners I Members of petitioners in khariff and Rabbi seasons 2016 to 2017 from the petitioner's Members loans released and to be released

Counsel for the Petitioner(S):

1. T V V KOTESWARA RAO

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1.

The Court made the following:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication and the writ petition has become infructuous.

Recording the submission of learned counsel for the petitioners, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.

As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.

__________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM

7th October, 2025 cbn

THE HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM

WP No.23191 of 2016

7th October, 2025 cbn

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead