Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/23191/2016 of Antcha Chandu Babu, s/o Venkateswararao Vs The Manager, State Bank of India, Sagar Road Branch, on 6 October 2025
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] TUESDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 23191/2016 Between: 1. ANTCHA CHANDU BABU, S/O VENKATESWARARAO, R/O. GANIKAPADU. 2.
APHC010222342016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF OCTOBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 23191/2016
Between:
1. ANTCHA CHANDU BABU, S/O VENKATESWARARAO, R/O.
GANIKAPADU.
2. ANTCHA
SREELAKSHMI,
W/O
ANKAMARAO,,
R/O
GANIKAPADU
3. ANTCHA
KUSUMAKUMARI,
W/O
SRINIVAS,,
R/O
GANIKAPADU
4. ANTCHA ANNAPURNA, W/O RAMBABU,, R/O GANIKAPADU
5. BOLLINENI HARIBABU, S/O SHESHAIAH,, R/O GANIKAPADU
6. NIMMAGADDA NAGARAJA KUMARI, W/O NARASAIAH,, R/O
GANIKAPADU
7. THE CHITYALA PACS, REP BY ITS PRESIDENT/CHAIRMAN
NARRA, MOHANREDDY, S/O NARAYANAREDDY, AGE 58
YRS, R/O VATTIMARPHY, CHITYAL MANDAL, NALGONDA
DIST.
8. THE SHALI GOWRARAM PACS, REP BY ITS PRESIDENT, LOKASANI, RANGAREDDY, S/O DASARADHA REDDY, AGE
45 YRS, R/O PERAKA KONDARAM , SHALI GOWRARAM
MANDAL, NALLAGONDA DISTRICT.
9. THE KETHAPALLI PACS, REP BY ITS PRESIDENT, BOJJA
CHINNA, VENKULU, R/O RAMACHARYULU, AGE 40 YRS, R/O VINUPAMULA, KETHEPALLI MANDAL, NALLAGONDA
DIST.
10. THE THATIKALLU PACS, REP BY ITS PRESIDENT, MADHA
ELIKA,, S/O SATTAIAH, AGE 30 YRS, R/O OGODU, NAKARIKALLU MANDAL, NALLAGONDA DISTRICT.
11. 'THE RAMANNAPETA PACS, REP BY ITS MEMBER, PITTA
KRISHNA, REDDY, S/O SRINIVASREDDY, AGE 35 YRS, R/O
KAKKIRENI,
RAMANNAPETA
MANDAL,
NALLAGONDA
DISTRICT.
12. THE
VALIGONDA
PACS,
REP
BY
ITS
PRESIDENT,
SURAKANTI, VENKATAREDDY, S/O NARSIREDDY, AGE 63
YRS, R/O SANGAM, VALIGONDA MANDAL , NALGONDA
DISTRICT.
13. CHALLA HANUMANTHARAO, S/O VENKATESWARLU,, R/O
PATLAVEEDU.
14. JAVVISETTY ADINARAYANA, S/O VENKATESWARLU,, R/O
GUNDLAPADU.
...PETITIONER(S)
AND
1. THE MANAGER STATE BANK OF INDIA SAGAR ROAD
BRANCH, MACHERLA, MACHERLA MANDAL, GUNTUR
DISTRICT.
2. THE CANADA BANK MACHERLA BRANCH MACHERLA
MACHERLA, MANDAL, GUNTURU DISTRICT.
3. THE MANAGER CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA GOTTIPADU
BRANCH, GOTTIPADU, PRATHIPADU MANDAL, GUNTUR
DISTRICT.
4. THE
CHIEF
EXECUTIVE
OFFICER
THE
NALLAGONDA
DISTRICT, CO-OPERATIVE CENTRAL BANK LTD, NALGONDA
, NALGONDA DIST.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ Order or orders more particularly in the nature of the Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in deducting the crop insurance premium from the crop loans released and to be released to the Petitioners/Members of Petitioners at the rate of 1% to 42.5 % towards crop Insurance premium in the khariff and rabbi seasons 2016 to 2017 as illegal, arbitrary , violation of provisions of Constitution of India and Contract Act and declare the same as optional IA NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP 28551 OF 2016
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents not to deduct the any Crop insurance premium from the petitioners I Members of petitioners in khariff and Rabbi seasons 2016 to 2017 from the petitioner's Members loans released and to be released
Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. T V V KOTESWARA RAO
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication and the writ petition has become infructuous.
Recording the submission of learned counsel for the petitioners, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.
As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
7th October, 2025 cbn
THE HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WP No.23191 of 2016
7th October, 2025 cbn