Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/32001/2016 of Vummadi Anil Kumar Reddy, Vs Indian Oil Corporation, on 6 October 2025
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] TUESDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 32001/2016 Between: 1. VUMMADI ANIL KUMAR REDDY,, S/O.RAMASUBBA REDDY, AGED ABOUT
APHC010756102016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF OCTOBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 32001/2016
Between:
1. VUMMADI ANIL KUMAR REDDY,, S/O.RAMASUBBA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O. 3/201-1A, SAIKUTEER
ROAD,
PRODDATUR
-
516360,
KADAPA
DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. INDIAN
OIL
CORPORATION,
REP.BY
ITS
GENERAL
MANAGER,
NASPUR
HOUSE,
HIMAYATH
NAGAR,
HYDERABAD.
2. THE CHIEF PLANT MANAGER, IOCL, LPG BOTTLING PLANT, KADAPA, ANDHRA PRADESH.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ of Mandamus, or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, declaring the action of the respondent in not allowing the petitioner's trucks into the premises of the respondent at Kadapa Bottling plant and engaging the petitioner's own workmen for the purpose of loading and unloading the LPG
cylinders during the subsistence of the Transportation Contract awarded pursuant to the Tender Notification No.APSO/LPG-O/PT-05/2013-14, as illegal and arbitrary IA NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP 39574 OF 2016
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant interim direction directing the respondents to immediately permit the trucks of the petitioners along with the workmen into the premises of the respondent at Kadapa Bottling plant by issuing Gate Passes, pending disposal of the above writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. V SESHA KUMARI
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. VENKATA DURGA RAO ANANTHA
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication and the writ petition has become infructuous.
Recording the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.
As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
7th October, 2025 cbn
THE HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WP No.32001 of 2016
7th October, 2025 cbn