Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/32001/2016 of Vummadi Anil Kumar Reddy, Vs Indian Oil Corporation, on 6 October 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] TUESDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 32001/2016 Between: 1. VUMMADI ANIL KUMAR REDDY,, S/O.RAMASUBBA REDDY, AGED ABOUT

APHC010756102016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

TUESDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF OCTOBER

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM

WRIT PETITION NO: 32001/2016

Between:

1. VUMMADI ANIL KUMAR REDDY,, S/O.RAMASUBBA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O. 3/201-1A, SAIKUTEER

ROAD,

PRODDATUR

-

516360,

KADAPA

DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.

...PETITIONER

AND

1. INDIAN

OIL

CORPORATION,

REP.BY

ITS

GENERAL

MANAGER,

NASPUR

HOUSE,

HIMAYATH

NAGAR,

HYDERABAD.

2. THE CHIEF PLANT MANAGER, IOCL, LPG BOTTLING PLANT, KADAPA, ANDHRA PRADESH.

...RESPONDENT(S):

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ of Mandamus, or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, declaring the action of the respondent in not allowing the petitioner's trucks into the premises of the respondent at Kadapa Bottling plant and engaging the petitioner's own workmen for the purpose of loading and unloading the LPG

cylinders during the subsistence of the Transportation Contract awarded pursuant to the Tender Notification No.APSO/LPG-O/PT-05/2013-14, as illegal and arbitrary IA NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP 39574 OF 2016

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant interim direction directing the respondents to immediately permit the trucks of the petitioners along with the workmen into the premises of the respondent at Kadapa Bottling plant by issuing Gate Passes, pending disposal of the above writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. V SESHA KUMARI

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. VENKATA DURGA RAO ANANTHA

The Court made the following:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication and the writ petition has become infructuous.

Recording the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.

As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.

__________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM

7th October, 2025 cbn

THE HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM

WP No.32001 of 2016

7th October, 2025 cbn

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead