Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/46371/2016 of Smt. T. Padma Vs Union of India, Rep. by the Deputy Secretary to the on 6 October 2025
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] TUESDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 46371/2016 Between: 1. SMT. T. PADMA, W/O. T.V. RAMANA RAJU HINDU, AGED ABOUT 42
APHC010557542016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF OCTOBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 46371/2016
Between:
1. SMT. T. PADMA, W/O. T.V. RAMANA RAJU HINDU, AGED
ABOUT
YEARS,
BUSINESS,
R/O.
4-248/5/4,
VIVEKANANDANAGAR
COLONY,
SAMSHABAD,
R.R.
DISTRICT, TELANGANA STATE
2. SMT. C.V. SOBHARANI, W/O. C. KRISHNA RAO HINDU, AGED
ABOUT 58 YEARS, BUSINESS, R/O. 50-120-8/5, SF-2, SHRIGURUKRUPA RESIDENCY, SEETHAMMADARA NORTH
EXTENTION, NEAR SAIBABA TEMPLE, VISAKHAPATNAM, ANDHRA PRADESH.
...PETITIONER(S)
AND
1. UNION OF INDIA REP BY THE DEPUTY SECRETARY TO THE, GOVERNMENT, MINISTRY OF INDUSTRY & COMMERCE, DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL POLICY AND PROMOTION
(SALT SECTION), UDHYOG BHAVAN, NEW DELHI.
2. SALT COMMISSIONER, LAVAN BHAVAN, 2A, LAVAN MARG, JHALANA DOONGIR, JAIPUR - 302 004.
3. DEPUTY SALT COMMISSIONER, 26, HADDOWS ROAD, SHASTRI BHAVAN, CHENNAI - 600006.
4. SALT
FACTORY
OFFICER,
KONADA
SALT
FACTORY,
KONADA, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toIssue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the letter No:
04014/1/2012/Salt dated 09-10-2013 in regard to enhancement of Assignment fee and Ground rent etc and G.O. No.04014/1/2012-Salt (SO No:2301) dated 09/10/2013 in regard to non renewal of leases, issued by the 1st Respondent as illegal, arbitrary and unjust in so far as it relates to renewal of leases and enhancement of assignment fees, ground rent and security deposit etc., and quash the same and
consequently direct the Respondents to continue the lease of the Petitioner on such conditions as may be agreed upon by the Petitioner without insisting payment of differential amount of assignment fee, ground rent etc., in the interest of justice and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP 57116 OF 2016
be pleased to grant stay of operation of letter No: 04014/1/2012/Salt dated 09-10-2013 in regard to enhancement of Assignment fee and Ground Rent etc and G O No.04014/1/2012- Salt (SO No:2301) dated 09/10/2013 in regard to non renewal of leases issued by 1st Respondent in the interest of justice pending disposal of the above Writ Petition and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2016(WPMP 57117 OF 2016
be pleased to grant stay of operation of letter F.No. 11/L and L9/KON/2016/140-143 dated 28/09/2016 by continuing the lease of the Petitioners herein in respect of Ac.39.46 cents of land under Licence No. 9 at Konada Salt Factory, Konada, Vizianagaram District in the interest of justice and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2017(WVMP 4073 OF 2017
be pleased vacate the interim order dated 2/1/2017 in WPMP No.
57116 of 2016 in WP No.46371 of 2016 and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. K SUBRAHMANYAM
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. JUPUDI V K YAGNADUTT(CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
COUNSEL)
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication and the writ petition has become infructuous.
Recording the submission of learned counsel for the petitioners, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.
As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
7th ssOctober, 2025 cbn
THE HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WP No.46371 of 2016
7th October, 2025 cbn