Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/26257/2016 of EVURI SUSEELA, REPUDI POST, & 180 OTRS. Vs THE UNION OF INDIA, AGRL.,NEW DELHI, & ANR. on 6 October 2025
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] TUESDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 26257/2016 Between: 1. EVURI SUSEELA, REPUDI POST, & 180 OTRS., - ...PETITIONER
APHC010627272016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF OCTOBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 26257/2016
Between:
1. EVURI SUSEELA, REPUDI POST, & 180 OTRS., -
...PETITIONER
AND
1. THE UNION OF INDIA AGRL NEW DELHI ANR, -
...RESPONDENT
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to IA NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP 32479 OF 2016
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent No. 2 not to deduct the crop insurance premium from the petitioners /members of petitioners for Khariff season 2016 at the rate of 1% to 12.5% from the petitioenrs loans released and to be released, by their respective Branches.
IA NO: 4 OF 2016(WPMP 150960 OF 2016
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. CHAKRAVARTHY P V S K
Counsel for the Respondent:
1. A KRANTI KUMAR REDDY
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication and the writ petition has become infructuous.
Recording the submission of learned counsel for the petitioners, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.
As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
7th October, 2025 cbn
THE HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WP No.26257 of 2016
7th October, 2025 cbn