Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/15577/2016 of Mr. M. Hari Babu, Vs The Union of India, Rep. by its Secretary, on 5 October 2025
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] MONDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 15577/2016 Between: 1. MR. M. HARI BABU,, S/O A . MANAVALAN, AGED 30 YEARS, OCC:
APHC010079792016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF OCTOBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 15577/2016
Between:
1. MR. M. HARI BABU,, S/O A. MANAVALAN, AGED 30 YEARS, OCC: TECHNICIAN III, T.L.SHOP, CARRIAGE REPAIR SHOP, SOUTH CENTRAL RAILWAY, TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
...PETITIONER
AND
1. THE
UNION
OF
INDIA
REP
BY
ITS
SECRETARY,
DEPARTMENT OF RAILWAYS, NEW DELHI,
2. THE SOUTH CENTRAL RAILWAYS REP BY ITS GENERAL
MANAGER, RAIL NILAYAM, SECUNDERABAD
3. THE CHIEF WORKSHOP MANAGER, SOUTH CENTRAL
RAILWAY, CARRIAGE REPAIR SHOP, TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR
DISTRICT
4. THE GENERAL MANAGER PERSONNEL, SOUTH CENTRAL
RAILWAY, RAIL NILAYAM, SECUNDERABAD
5. THE CHIEF PERSONNEL OFFICER SOUTH CENTRAL
RAILWAY, RAIL NILAYAM, SECUNDERABAD
6. THE SOUTH CENTRAL RAILWAY MAZDOOR UNION, REP.
BY ITS GENERAL SECRETARY, CENTRAL OFFICE, 7C, RAILWAY
BUILDINGS,
LEKHA
BHAVAN
COMPOUND,
SECUNDERABAD - 500 071
7. MR M SURENDRA REDDY, S/O NOT KNOWN TO THE
PETITIONER, AGED 52 YEARS, OCC: RAILWAY EMPLOYEE, 0/0 SR. TECHNICIAN, CBR SHOP, CRS, SETTIPALLY POST, TIRUPATI - 517 506 CHITTOOR DISTRICT
8. MR K BABU, S/O NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, AGED
45 YEARS, OCC: RAILWAY EMPLOYEE, 0/O TECHNICIAN-II, CBR SHOP, CRS, SETTIPALLY POST, TIRUPATI - 517 506
CHITTOOR DISTRICT
9. MR CHANDRA NAIK, S/O NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, AGED
YEARS,
OCC:
RAILWAY
EMPLOYEE,
0/O
TECHNICIAN-I, WHEEL SHOP, CRS, SETTIPALLY POST,
TIRUPATI - 517 506 CHITTOOR DISTRICT
10. MR G RAVICHANDRAN, S/O NOT KNOWN TO THE
PETITIONER, AGED 53 YEARS, OCC: RAILWAY EMPLOYEE, 0/O SR. TECHNICIAN, PAINT & TRIMMING SHOP, CRS, SETTIPALLY POST, TIRUPATI 517 506 CHITTOOR DISTRICT
11. MR K SADHASIVA REDDY, S/O NOT KNOWN TO THE
PETITIONER, AGED 45 YEARS, OCC: RAILWAY EMPLOYEE, 0/0 TECHNICIAN -I, CF SHOP, CRS, SETTIPALLY POST, TIRUPATI - 517 506 CHITTOOR DISTRICT
12. P
CHANDRASEKHAR,
S/O
NOT
KNOWN
TO
THE
PETITIONER, AGED 30 YEARS, OCC: RAILWAY EMPLOYEE, 0/O TECHNICIAN, CF SHOP, CRS, SETTIPALLY POST, TIRUPATI - 517 506 CHITTOOR DISTRICT
13. MR UDAY ROY, S/O NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, AGED
YEARS,
OCC:
RAILWAY
EMPLOYEE,
0/O
TECHNICIAN, TRAIN LIGHTING SHOP, CRS, SETTIPALLY
POST, TIRUPATI - 517 506 CHITTOOR DISTRICT
14. HENRY PAUL, S/O NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, AGED
32 YEARS, OCC: RAILWAY EMPLOYEE, 0/0 TECHNICIAN, CBR SHOP, CRS, SETTIPALLY POST, TIRUPATI - 517 506
CHITTOOR DISTRICT
15. P SREENIVASULU, S/O NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, AGED
YEARS,
OCC:
RAILWAY
EMPLOYEE,
0/O
TECHNICIAN,
POWER
MAINTENANCE
SHOP,
CRS,
SETTIPALLY
POST,
TIRUPATI
CHITTOOR
DISTRICT
16. P POORNA KUMAR, S/O NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, AGED
YEARS,
OCC:
RAILWAY
EMPLOYEE,
0/O
TECHNICIAN,
CBR
SHOP,
CRS,
SETTIPALLY
POST,
TIRUPATI - 517 506 CHITTOOR DISTRICT
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an appropriate writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, directing the 4th respondent to consider the representation dated 07.03.2016 of the petitioner in the light of the principle that a contesting candidate for any post of the Managing Committee of the "Carriage Repair Shop Branch", Tirupati cannot be a "Returning Officer" and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.
IA NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP 19283 OF 2016
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct respondent No.4th to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 07.03.2016 pending final disposal of the main writ petition IA NO: 4 OF 2016(WPMP 82235 OF 2016
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. T LAKSHMI NARAYANA
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. V SRIHARI
2. P BHASKAR
3. S SIVA KUMARI
4. HARINATH N (DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA)
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication and the writ petition has become infructuous.
Recording the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.
As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
6th October, 2025 cbn
THE HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WP No.15577 of 2016
6th October, 2025 cbn