Andhra Pradesh High Court
CMA/825/2009 of KUNDU SURYANARAYANA AND 2 OTHERS Vs RAMACHANDRA PANDA on 24 September 2025
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 825/2009 Between: 1. KUNDU SURYANARAYANA AND 2 OTHERS, S/O
APHC010251072009
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 825/2009
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. KUNDU SURYANARAYANA AND 2 OTHERS, S/O LATE KAMARAJU BUSINESS R/O TILAKNAGAR, KASIGUBBA PALASA, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT.
2. KUNDU DHARMARAJU, S/O LATE KAMARAJU BUSINESS R/O TILAKNAGAR, KASIGUBBA PALASA, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT.
3. KUNDU KRISHNA RAO, S/O LATE KAMARAJU REPORTER OF ANDHRA BHOOMI R/O TILAKNAGAR, KASIGUBBA PALASA, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT.
...APPELLANT(S) AND
1. RAMACHANDRA PANDA, S/o Keerthirayi Radha Pandyanigari Narasimhapanda, R/o Peddabrahmin Street, Kasibugga, Palasa Mandalam,
...RESPONDENT IA NO: 1 OF 2009(CMAMP 1440 OF 2009 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased suspend the operation of the Docket order passed in IA.NO.788 of 2009 in O.S.No.9 of 2009 on the file of the District Judge, Srikakulam dated 27-4- 2009, pending disposal of the main CMA Counsel for the Appellant(S):
1. A RAVI SHANKAR Counsel for the Respondent:
1. D RAMALINGA SWAMY The Court made the following JUDGMENT:
Learned counsel for the appellants submits that the cause in the civil miscellaneous appeal does not survive for adjudication.
Recording the submission of learned counsel appearing for the appellants, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date: 25.09.2025 KAS
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 825/2009
Date: 25.09.2025 KAS