Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/22921/2014 of Aditya Educational Society, Vs Medical Council of India, on 23 September 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 22921/2014 Between: 1. ADITYA EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,, 6-2-13, CHINNA

APHC010635182014

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM

WRIT PETITION NO: 22921/2014

Between:

1. ADITYA EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,, 6-2-13, CHINNA BAZAAR, SRIKAKULAM, AP.NO.532 001, REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN, DR.

M.M.VILEKAR.

2. GREAT

EASTERN

MEDICAL

SCHOOL,,

RAGOLU,

SRIKAKULAM, REP. BY ITS DIRECTOR, DR. M.M.VILEKAR.

3. DR. M.M.VILEKAR,, S/O MARUTI RAO VILEKAR, R/O 6-2-13, CHINNA BAZAR, SRIKAKULAM, AP 532 001.

...PETITIONER(S)

AND

1. MEDICAL COUNCIL OF INDIA, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, BOCKET-14, SECTOR-A, DARAKA PAHASE-1, NEW DELHI-110

077.

2. UNION OF INDIA, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, MINSTRY OF

HEALTH & FAMILY WELFARE, NIRMAL BHAVAN, NEW DELHI.

3. GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS

PRL.SECY., MEDICAL, HEALTH & FAMILY WELFARE DEPT., SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, HYDERABAD.

4. NTR UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES, REP. BY ITS

REGISTRAR, VIJAYAWADA,

5. CONVENOR EAMCET 201415, HYDERABAD.

...RESPONDENT(S):

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue any Writ, Order or Direction, more

particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 1st respondent in not granting the renewal of approval to the second petitioner institution for the fifth batch for the academic year 201415 by issuing communication in File No. U-12012/340/2014- ME(PII) dated 15-07-2014 as arbitrary, illegal, unlawful nd contrary to the provisions of the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956, the regulations made there under, apart from being unconstitutional and set aside the same and direct the respondents to grant approval and treat the 2nd petitioner institution as an approved institution for the fifth batch for the academic year 201415 and permit the 2nd petitioner institution to make admission for the academic year 2014-15 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP 28735 OF 2014

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to supend the proceedings in File No.U-12012/340/2014- ME(PII) dt.15-07-2014 and thereby direct respondents No.1 and 2 to reconsider and grant renewal of approval for the fifty batch of 2nd petitioner institution for the academic year 2014-15, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2014(WPMP 28736 OF 2014

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respectfully pray that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to direct the resondents to treat the 2nd petitioner institution as a validly approved institution and include the name of the 2nd petitioner institution in the list of approved institutions for making admissions to the academic year 2014-15 pending disposal of the Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):

1. OMAR A PASHA

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA

2. SRINIVAS DAMMALAPATI

The Court made the following:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication and the writ petition has become infructuous.

Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.

As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.

__________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM

24th September, 2025 cbn

THE HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM

WP No.22921 of 2014

24th September, 2025 cbn

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead