WP/694/2015 of Urmila Devi, Vs INS Circars ( Indian Naval Ship) rep. by its on 22 September 2025

1. URMILA DEVI, W/O.LATE. V.K. SINGH, HINDU, FEMALE, AGE: 44 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.71-31-606/1, KRANTHI NAGAR, GANDHI GRAM, VISAKHAPATNAM-530005 A.P.

...PETITIONER AND

1. INS CIRCARS INDIAN NAVAL SHIP REP BY ITS, COMMANDING OFFICER, VISAKHAPATNAM-530014. A.P.

2. UNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OF DEFENCE, INTEGRATED HEAD QUARTERS, (NAVY) NEW DELHI-110011. REP. BY IT CHIEF OF THE NAVAL STAFF.

3. THE JOINT DIRECTOR NRS, EXTN.

6TH FLOOR, CHANIKKYAPURI BHAVAN, NEW DELHI-110021.

4. THE FLAG OFFICER COMMANDING IN CHIEF HEAD QUARTERS, EASTERN NAVAL COMMAND, NAVAL BASE, VISAKHAPATNAM- 530014.

5. THE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER, ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE, NAUSENA BAUGH, VISAKHAPATNAM-530005.

...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature

JS,J W.P.No.694/2015

of Writ of Mandamus declaring the vacation notices issued by the 5th respondent dt: 9-12-2014, 8-8-2014 and 25-3-2014 without passing any orders in-pursuance of the directions given by the 3rd respondent dt: 10-10- 2014 and making attempts to dispossess the petitioner from the shop while allowing other similarly situated licensees of shop No.19, Raju Kirana, PG Reddy Shop, Sai Bakery, Sharma Fancy Stores, Friends Cool Point, Raju Electrical for more than 13 to 25 years and directing the petitioner to vacate the shop within 10 years is unjust, arbitrary, capricious and violative of Article 14 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently to set aside the vacation notices dt: 9-12-2014, 8-8-2014 & 25-3-2014 and further direct the respondents to consider her case for continuation of her license for shop No.21 of Nausena Baugh, Visakhapatnam on par with other shops referred to above in-pursuance the directions of the r respondent dt: 10-10-2014 and also on her representation made in December, 2014 IA NO: 1 OF 2015(WPMP 843 OF 2015

in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to dispossess the petitioner from shop No.21 of Nausena Baugh, Visakhapatnam in-pursuance of the vacation notices dt: 9- 12-2014, 8-8-2014 & 25-3-2014, pending disposal of the writ petition IA NO: 4 OF 2015(WVMP 4264 OF 2015 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased vacate the interim order dated 28-1-2015 passed by this Hon'ble Court in W.P.NO. 694 of 2015 and to dismiss the writ petition and pass IA NO: 5 OF 2015(WPMP 35409 OF 2015

in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. K JYOTHI PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA

JS,J W.P.No.694/2015

The Court made the following ORDER:

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has vacated the shop bearing No.21 of Nausena Baugh, Visakhapatnam and the same was allotted to another person. Hence, the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication.

Recording the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date: 23.09.2025 KAS

JS,J

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM

WRIT PETITION NO: 694/2015

Date: 23.09.2025 KAS