WP/27764/2015 of M/s. Harsha Emu Farms, Vs The Union of India, on 22 September 2025

APHC010602922015

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

TUESDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF SEPTEMBER

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM

WRIT PETITION NO: 27764/2015

Between:

1. M/S. HARSHA EMU FARMS,, REP. BY R.USHA RANI, W/O.

G.HARI KRISHNA NAIDU, AGED: 38 YRS, R/O. 740/3A, PALAKUR ROSD, PUTHALAPATTU, CHITTOOR DIST.

2. M/S. VASANTHA EMU FARMS,, REP. BY T.SUBRAMANYAM

REDDY, S/O. T.GOVINDA REDDY, AGED: 60 YRS, OCC:

AGRICULTURE,

R/O.CHINAKAMPALLI

VILLAGE,

IRALA

MANDAL, CHITTOOR DIST.

3. VINAYAKA EMU FARM,, REP. BY M.SUBRAMANYAM NAIDU, S/O.

RAGHUNANDA

NAIDU,

AGED:

YRS,

OCC:

AGRICULTURE, R/O. MADDIPATLAPALLI, IRALA MANDAL, CHITTOOR DIST.

4. SAI KRISHNA EMU FARMS,, REP. BY K. SUDHAKAR REDDY, S/O. K.RAMACHANDRA REDDY, AGED: 60 YRS, OCC:

AGRICULTURE, R/O. MUBIGALLAM VILLAGE & POST, IRALA

MANDAL, CHITTOOR DIST.

5. OOHA EMU FARMS,, REP. BY K. PALAKSHI NAIDU, S/O.K.KANNAIAH

NAIDU,

AGED:

YRS,

OCC:

AGRICULTURE, R/O. LAXMIPURAM VILLAGE, N.R.PETA

POST, CHITTOOR DIST.

...PETITIONER(S)

AND

1. THE UNION OF INDIA, REP. BY JOINT SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE, DEPARTMENT OF ANIMAL

HUSBANDARY, DAIRYING & FISHERIES, KRISHI BHAVAN,

NEW DELHI-110114.

2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL

SECRETARY,

ANIMAL

HUSBANDARY

&

FISHERIES

DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT, SAIFABAD, HYDERABD.

3. THE CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER NABARD REGIONAL, OFFICE, RTC 'X' ROADS, MUSHEERABAD, HYDERABAD.

4. THE DIRECTOR, ANIMAL HUSBANDARY DEPARTMENT FOR

THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, SHANTHI NAGAR, HYDERABAD.

5. STATE LEVEL BANKERS COMMITTEE OF A P, REP. BY ITS

CONVINEOR ANDHRA BANK, PHATTABI BHAVAN, SAIFABAD, HYDERABAD.

6. THE BRANCH MANAGER, SYNDICATE BANK, CHITTOOR

BRANCH, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, A.P.

7. THE BRANCH MANAGER SAPTAGIRI GRAMEENA, BANK, KANIPAKAM BRANCH, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, A.P.

8. THE BRANCH MANAGER, ANDHRA BANK, KANIPAKAM

BRANCH, CHITTOOR DIST.

9. THE

BRANCH

MANAGER,

CANARA

BANK,

CHITTOOR

BRANCH, CHITTOOR DIST.

...RESPONDENT(S):

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto, issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of Respondents No. 1 to 5 in not considering the representations, dated:

04-112013, 23-12-2013, 05-06-2014, Nill , 20-10-2014 and 20-10-2014

of the petitioners to waive the loans which were sanctioned by the 3rd RespondentNABARD pursuant to the introduction of schemes by the 1st respondent-Central Government and also action of the Respondents No. 6 & 9-Banks in insisting for repayment of loan amount, pending decision of 3rd Respondent-NABARD on the recomendations made by the 5th respondent-State Level Bankers Committee, dated 14-02-2014

as illegal, arbitrary, uncounstitutional, violation of principles of natural justice, and violation of Art. 14, 19 of the constitution of india and consequently direct the Respondents No. 6 & 9-Banks not to insist the petitioners for repayment of loan amount till a decision is taken by 3rd Respondent-NABARD on the recomendations made by the 5th respondents-State Level Bankers Committee, dated 14-02-2014 and further direct the Respondents No. 1 to 5 to waive the loans which were advanced to the petitoners by directing the Respondents No. 6 &

9/Banks not to harass the petitioners for repayment of loans and pass

such other order or orders may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.

IA NO: 1 OF 2015(WPMP 36039 OF 2015

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to, direct the Respondents No. 6 & 9-Banks not to insist the petitioners for repayment of loan amount till a decision is taken by the 3rd Respondent-NABARD on the recomendations made by the 5th respondents-State Level Bankers Committee, dated 14-02-2014, pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass such other order or orders may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.

IA NO: 4 OF 2015(WPMP 158780 OF 2015

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner(S):

1. N RAVI PRASAD

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. M SRIKANTH REDDY

2. V UMA DEVI

3. V RAGHU

4. S SIVA KUMARI

5. GP FOR FISHERIES (AP)

The Court made the following: