Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/22922/2014 of Mohammadiya Educational Society, Vs Union of India, on 22 September 2025
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 22922/2014 Between: 1. MOHAMMADIYA EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY, REP. BY ITS
APHC010497392014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF SEPTEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 22922/2014
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. MOHAMMADIYA EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, MR. JAVVAD AHMED QURESHI, RAMARAJUPALLY, PULIVENDULA ROAD, KADAPA, ANDHRA PRADESH
2. FATHIMA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, MOHAMMADIYA, EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY & CORRESPONDENT, MR. JAVVAD AHMED QURESHI, RAMARAJUPALLY, PULIVENDULA ROAD, KADAPA, ANDHRA PRADESH
3. MR. JAVVAD AHMED QURESHI, S/O. LATE A.Q.JEELANI, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARSR RAMARAJUPALLY, PULIVENDULA ROAD, KADAPA ANDHRA PRADESH
...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. UNION OF INDIA, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF HEALTH & FAMILY WELFARE, NIRMAL BHAVAN, NEW DELHI
2. MEDICAL COUNCIL OF INDIA,
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, BOCKET - 14, SECTOR - A, DARAKA PHASE - 1, NEW DELHI - 110077
3. GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MEDICAL, HEALTH & FAMILY WELFARE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, HYDERABAD
JS,J W.P.No.22922/2014
4. NTR UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, VIJAYAWADA
5. CONVENOR EAMCET 201415, HYDERABAD
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue any Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 1st respondent in not granting the renewal of approval for the 2nd petitioner institution for the fifth batch for the academic year 2014-15 by issuing communication in File No. U- 12012/738/2014- ME(PII) dated 15-07-2014 as arbitrary, illegal, unlawful and contrary to the provisions of the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956, the regulations made there under, apart from being unconstitutional and set aside the same and direct the respondents to grant approval and treat the 2nd petitioner institution as an approved institution for the fifth batch for the academic year 201415 and permit the 2nd petitioner institution to make admission for the academic year 2014-15 and pass such order other orders as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper.
in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the proceedings in File No. U-12012/738/2014-ME(PII) dated 15-07- 2014 and thereby direct respondents No.1 and 2 to reconsider and grant renewal of approval for the fifty batch of 2nd petitioner institution for the academic year 2014-15, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition and pass such order or other orders as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to treat the 2nd petitioner institution as a validly approved institution and include the name of the 2nd petitioner institution in the list of approved institutions for making admissions to the academic year 2014-15 pending disposal of the Writ Petition and pass such order or other orders as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.
JS,J
in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. OMAR A PASHA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA
2. P VIVEK
3. SRINIVAS DAMMALAPATI
4. GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH FW(AP)
JS,J W.P.No.22922/2014
The Court made the following ORDER:
No representation for the petitioners.
On the earlier occasion also i.e., on 16.09.2025, there was no representation for the petitioners. Hence, the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption “For Orders”.
Today there is no representation for the petitioners.
Since the matter pertains to renewal of approval for the fifth batch admissions in the 2nd petitioner’s institution for the academic year 2014-15, the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication.
Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date: 23.09.2025 KAS
JS,J
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 22922/2014
Date: 23.09.2025 KAS