Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/9898/2015 of Mettireddi Venkatesh, Vs Indian Oil Corporation Limited, on 22 September 2025
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 9898/2015 Between: 1. METTIREDDI VENKATESH, S/O. GOWRI AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS,
APHC010719032015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF SEPTEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 9898/2015
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. METTIREDDI VENKATESH, S/O. GOWRI AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O. H.NO.1-55, DATTIRAJERU VILLAGE & MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT, A.P.
...PETITIONER AND
1. INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LIMITED, INDANE AREA OFFICE, 8TH FLOOR, LIC BUILDING, JEEVAN PRAKASH, JEEVITHA BHIMA MARG, VISAKHAPATNAM, REP. BY ITS CHIEF AREA MANAGER.
2. SMT SHOBA DEVI GOTTUMUKKALA, W/O. SATYANARAYANA RAJU GOTTUMUKKALA, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O. D.NO.39-8-8/2/11, MURALI NAGAR, SAVITRASADAN OPPOSITE VARMA COMPLEX, VISAKHAPATNAM URBAN, VISAKHAPATNAM, A.P.
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or direction declaring the order of the 1st respondent dt.11.3.2015 as illegal, arbitrary and consequently direct the 1st respondent to conduct enquiry on the basis of the complaint given by petitioner after affording him an opportunity and pass
IA NO: 1 OF 2015(WPMP 13011 OF 2015 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased stay all further proceedings including opening of the RGGLV Distributorship Dattirajru Village & Mandal, Vizianagaram, pending disposal of the WP and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. S V RAMANA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. SAI SANJAY SURANENI
2. B S SHIVAJI The Court made the following ORDER:
Sri Ravi Kumar, learned counsel, represented virtually on behalf of Sri S.V. Ramana, learned counsel for the petitioner, and submitted that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication.
Recording the submission of learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date: 23.09.2025 KAS
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 9898/2015
Date: 23.09.2025 KAS