WP/22016/2014 of Gendi Chinna Mahendra, S/o. G. Mastanaiah Vs The Union of India on 22 September 2025

1. GENDI CHINNA MAHENDRA, S/O. G. MASTANAIAH, STUDENT, BEING MINOR, REP. BY HIS FATHER GENDI MASTANAIAH, S/O. MABBAIAH, AGED 52 YEARS, OCC: DAILY WAGE EARNER, R/O. KALICHEDU VILLAGE, SAIDAPURAM MANDAL, NELLORE DIST.

2. KARANAM JYOTHI, D/O. K. MURALI, STUDENT, BEING MINOR, REP. BY HER FATHER, KARANAM MURALI, S/O. KRISHNAIAH, AGED 44 YEARS, OCC: DAILY WAGE EARNER, R/O. TURIMERLA VILLAGE, SAIDAPURAM MANDAL, NELLORE DISTRICT.

3. D. MAMATHA, D/O. D. VENKATAIAH, STUDENT BEING MINOR, REP. BY HER FATHER, D. VENKATAIAH, S/O. ROSAIAH, AGED 49 YEARS, OCC: DAILY WAGE EARNER, R/O. THUMMALATHALUPUR VILLAGE, SAIDAPURAM MANDAL, NELLORE DISTRICT.

4. MOCHERLA PUJITHA, D/O. M. SESHAIAH, STUDENT, BEING MINOR, REP. BY HER FATHER, M. SESHAIAH, S/O. VENKATA SUBBAIAH, AGED 44 YEARS, OCC: DAILY WAGE EARNER, R/O. THUMMALATHALUPUR VILLAGE, SAIDAPURAM MANDAL, NELLORE DISTRICT.

...PETITIONER(S) AND

1. THE UNION OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT, NEW DELHI, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY.

2. THE GOVT OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT,

JS,J W.P.No.22016/2014

OFFICE OF THE WELFARE COMMISSIONER, LABOUR WELFARE ORGANIZATION, HYDERABAD, REP. BY WELFARE COMMISSIONER.

3. THE DIRECTOR OF SCHOOL EDUCATION, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, SAIFABAD, HYDERABAD.

4. HEAD MASTER MICA MINES LABOUR WELFARE, ORGANIZATION SCHOOL, KALICHEDU SAIDAPURAM MANDAL, NELLORE DISTRICT.

5. HEAD MASTER MICA MINES LABOUR WELFARE, ORGANIZATION SCHOOL, THUMMALATHALUPUR, SAIDAPURAM MANDAL, NELLORE DISTRICT.

...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue any appropriate Writ, Order or direction preferably a Writ in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents in not posting the qualified teaching staff to the respondent schools i.e., 4 and 5th respondents in spite of several representations made by the parents of the students, as being illegal, arbitrary, contrary to the interim order dt.22.11.2006 made in W.P.M.P. No. 16857 of 2006 in W.P. No. 7575 of 2006 and also violative of the provisions of the A.P. Education Act and the rules made thereunder, and consequently direct the respondents 1 to 3 forthwith post full strength of the qualified teaching staff in the respondents 4 and 5 schools. IA NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP 27617 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents 1 to 3 to forthwith post full strength of the qualified teaching staff in the respondents 4 and 5 schools, pending disposal of the above writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner(S):

1. A VENKATESWARLU Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR SCHOOL EDUCATION (AP)

JS,J W.P.No.22016/2014

2. DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA The Court made the following ORDER:

No representation for the petitioners.

On the earlier occasions also i.e., on 08.09.2025 and 16.09.2025, there was no representation for the petitioners. Hence, the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption “for dismissal”.

Even today there is no representation for the petitioners. It appears that the petitioners are not interested to prosecute the case.

Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed as non-prosecution. No order as to costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date: 23.09.2025 KAS

JS,J

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM

WRIT PETITION NO: 22016/2014

Date: 23.09.2025 KAS