Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/36467/2014 of M/s East West Pharma, Vs The Chief Medical Officer, on 16 September 2025
COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHl'JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 36467 OF 2014 Between: M/s East West Pharma, Administration Office; No. 10, 2^"^
APHC010444982014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA
PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY,THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 36467/2014
Between:
1. M/S EAST WEST PHARMA,, ADMINISTRATION OFFICE:
NO.10, 2ND CROSS, MARAVANERI, SALEM - 636007, TAMEA/EIKCLU.
REPRESENTED
BY
ITS
EXECUTIVE-
COMPANY AFFAIRS SHRI A.VENKATASUBBU S/O LATE
ALAGARSAMY.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. THE CHIEF MEDICAL OFFICER, Golden Jubilee Hospital, Visakhapatnam Port Trust, (Central Government Undertaking), Salagramapuram, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh - 530024.
...RESPONDENT
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the respondent rejecting the Tender of the petitioner without any valid reason and not considering petitioners representation dated 31-10-2014
as illegal, arbitrary & unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondent to forthwith consider the petitioners representation dated 31-10-2014 and include the petitioner in the suppliers list or call for a fresh e-tender IA NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP 45648 OF 2014
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may
be pleased to direct the respondent herein to forthwith consider petitioners representation dated 31-10-2014 in accordance with law pending disposal of the above writ petition IA NO: 2 OF 2015(WPMP 99933 OF 2015
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. M/S LEGOAL LAW SERVICES
Counsel for the Respondent:
1. P SRI RAM
2. VIRUPAKSHA DATTATREYA GOUDA (SC FOR
VISAKHAPATNAM PORT AUTHORITY)
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner.
2. Since the tender relates to the procurement of drugs and medicines for the respondent’s hospital for the year 2014-2015, the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication and the writ petition has become infructuous.
3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
_________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM 17th September, 2025 cbn
THE HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WP No.36467 of 2014
17th September, 2025 cbn