Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/34894/2014 of Miss. Nachu Lakshmi Manojna, Vs The Dental Council of India, on 16 September 2025
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] WEDNESDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 34894/2014 Between: 1. MISS. NACHU LAKSHMI MANOJNA,, D/O. N. DURGA PRASAD,
APHC010625052014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY,THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 34894/2014
Between:
1. MISS. NACHU LAKSHMI MANOJNA,, D/O. N. DURGA PRASAD, AGED ABOUT 18 YEARS, OCC: STUDENT, R/O. 15-15/5, NACHUVARI CENTER, BHIMAVARAM, WEST GODAVARI
DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. THE DENTAL COUNCIL OF INDIA, AIWAN-E-GALIB MARG, KOTLA ROAD, NEW DELHI
- 110 002, REP.BY
ITS
SECRETARY.
2. DR N T R UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. REP. BY ITS REGISTRAR.
3. DRS SUDHA NAGESWARA RAO, SIDHARTHA INSTITUTE OF
DENTAL SCIENCE CHINAOUTPALLI, GANNAVARAM MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL.
4. VISHNU DENTAL COLLEGE, VISHNUPUR, BHIMAVARAM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toIssue an appropriate writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring Proceedings No. CE-114-2013/12104, Dt. 17.12.2013 issued by the 1st respondent in rejecting the application of the petitioner for migration from 3rd respondent college to 4th respondent college as illegal, arbitrary, unreasonable and set-aside the same consequently direct the 1st respondent to transfer the petitioner from the 3rd respondent college
to 4th respondent college to appear for the ensuing 2nd year BDS
course and pass
IA NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP 43658 OF 2014
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the 1st respondent to transfer the petitioner from the 3rd respondent college to 4th respondent college to appear for the ensuing 2nd year BDS, pending disposal of the main writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. SUDARSHAN MALUGARI
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.
2. P VISHNUVARDHANA REDDY
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
The present writ petition is filed challenging the proceedings dated 17.12.2013 issued by the 1st respondent, whereby the petitioner’s application for migration from the 3rd respondent college to the 4th respondent college was rejected.
2. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner.
3. Since the issue pertains to EAMCET Examinations of the academic year 2011–2012, the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication and the writ petition has become infructuous.
4. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
17th September, 2025 cbn
THE HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WP No.34894 of 2014
17th September, 2025 cbn