WP/30388/2014 of Thenneti Indrazith, Vs The Secretary to Govt. of India, on 15 September 2025

APHC010446482014

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

TUESDAY,THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM

WRIT PETITION NO: 30388/2014

Between:

1. THENNETI INDRAZITH,, S/ O.YESURATNAM, AGED 26

YEARS,

OCC:

UNEMPLOYEE,

MATTAPARRU

VILLAGE,

PODURU MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT.

...PETITIONER

AND

1. THE SECRETARY TO GOVT OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF

EXTERNAL AFFAIRS, NEW DELHI.

2. AMBASSADOR OF INDIA, DIPLOMATIC ENCLAVE, ARABIAN

GULF STREET, P.0 BOX NO.1450, SAFAT 13015, KUWAIT.

3. AMBASSADOR OF KUWAIT, NEW DELHI.

4. CHIEF

SECRETARY

TO

GOVERNMENT

OF

A

P,

SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, HYDERABAD.

5. ALZAHARAALZAHIRA QATHA21, INDUSTRY STREET NO.5, GAREGE-124, KHASIMA-800

017,

KUWAIT

CIVIL

ID

NO.36198/301581,

...RESPONDENT(S):

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an appropriate Writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 5th respondent as highly illegal, arbitrary and contrary to law and consequently direct the respondent 1 to 4 to take necessary action on the petitioner's representation dated 12.09.2014 and pass such other further orders as are deemed fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.

IA NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP 37989 OF 2014

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents No.1 to 4 to consider petitioner's representation dated 12.09.2014 and take appropriate action against the 5th respondent as per law and call back the petitioner's brother Thenneti Karnudu (Passport No.H1610302) to his mother land (India)

immediately and pass such other further orders as are deemed fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.

Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. VENKATESWARA RAO MANDA

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA

2. GP FOR GENERAL ADMINISTRATION (AP)

The Court made the following: