Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/9146/2014 of M/s.Gayatri Traders Vs Government of Andhra Pradesh on 11 September 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] FRIDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 9146/2014 Between: 1. M/S.GAYATRI TRADERS, REP. BY ITS PROPRIETOR, SMT.K.SHEELA

APHC010701952014

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

FRIDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM

WRIT PETITION NO: 9146/2014

Between:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. M/S.GAYATRI TRADERS, REP. BY ITS PROPRIETOR, SMT.K.SHEELA LAKSHMINARAYANAPURAM, BANTUMMILLI, KRISHNA DISTRICT.

...PETITIONER AND

1. GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL SUPPLIES, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, SAIFABAD, HYDERABAD.

2. THE JOINT COLLECTOR, KRISHNA AT MACHILIPATNAM.

3. FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA FCI, REP. BY ITS AREA MANAGER/DISTRICT MANAGER, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT.

4. THE MANAGER DEPOT, FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA (FCI) GUDIVADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT.

...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents No.3 and 4 in not accepting to receive the milled levy rice from the petitioner for Khariff Marketing Season (KMS) 2013-14 on the ground that the petitioner did not supply the total quantity of milled levy rice for Khariff Marketing Season (KMS)

JS,J W.P.No.9146/2014

2012-13 in spite of the MSP Certificate No.1349, dated 10-03-2014 issued by the 2nd respondent, as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14 and 19(1) of the Constitution of India apart from being violative of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents No.3 and 4 to receive the milled levy rice from the petitioner for Khariff Marketing Season (KMS) 2013- 14 as per the Minimum Support Price Certificates issued by the 2nd respondent and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP 11430 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents No.3 and 4 to receive the milled levy rice from the petitioners for the quantity specified in the MSP Certificate No.1349, dated 10- 03-2014 issued by the 2nd respondent for Khariff Marketing Season (KMS) 2013-14 at the depot/godown at Gudivada or at any other depot of the 3rd respondent in Krishna District, pending disposal of the main writ petition and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2014(WPMP 17041 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents No.3 and 4 to receive the milled levy rice from the petitioner for the quantity specified in the MSP (Minimum Spearated Price) Certificate No.1349, dated 10-03-2014 issued by the 2nd respondent for Khariff Marketing Season (KMS) 2013-14 at the depot/godown at Gudivada or at any other depot of the 3rd respondent in Krishna District, pending disposal of the main writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. K V ADITYA CHOWDARY Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. CHINTALAPUDI LAKSHMI KUMARI

2. S SYAMSUNDER RAO

3. JS,J W.P.No.9146/2014

The Court made the following ORDER:

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication.

Recording the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.

__________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date: 12.09.2025 KAS

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead