Andhra Pradesh High Court
CMA/368/2012 of TANAKALA KRISHNAVENAMMA Vs THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER AND ANOTHER on 11 September 2025
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] FRIDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 368/2012 Between: 1. TANAKALA KRISHNAVENAMMA, W/O. BHASKAR RAO R/O.
APHC010124792012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3459]
FRIDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 368/2012
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. TANAKALA KRISHNAVENAMMA, W/O. BHASKAR RAO R/O. SONPETA, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT.
...APPELLANT AND
1. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER AND ANOTHER, ENDOWMENTS DEPARTMENT, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT.
2. SRI KODANDA RAMA SWAMY TEMPLE, REP., BY ITS EXECUTIVE OFFICER SOMPETA, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S): IA NO: 1 OF 2012(CMAMP 773 OF 2012 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of order and decree in OA.No.1571/2010 dated 27.10.2011 on the file of the AP.Endowments Tribunal at Hyderabad, pending final disposal of main appeal or in the alternative to direct the respondents 1 and 2 not evict the petitioner from the schedule house situated in survey No. 2590/2A measuring East West 13 feet and South-North 68 feet at sompeta Village, in the interest of justice IA NO: 2 OF 2012(CMAMP 1320 OF 2012 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim order dt. 27-4-2012 passed in CMA No. 368 of 2012 and pass Counsel for the Appellant:
1. K MANIK PRABHU Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. V T M PRASAD The Court made the following JUDGMENT:
No representation for the appellant.
On the earlier occasions also i.e., on 10.07.2025, 07.08.2025 and 29.08.2025, there was no representation on behalf of learned counsel for the appellant. Hence, the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption “for dismissal”.
Even today there is no representation for the appellant. It appears that the appellant is not interested to prosecute the case.
Hence, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed for default. No order as to costs.
Interim order granted earlier shall stand vacated.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date: 12.09.2025 KAS