Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/15781/2011 of Smt.B.R.Ratnashree Vs Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd., (A govt., of India on 9 September 2025
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] WEDNESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 15781/2011 Between: 1. SMT.B.R.RATNASHREE, W/O S.K.CHANDRA SHEKAR HOUSE HOLD
APHC010069052011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 15781/2011
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. SMT.B.R.RATNASHREE, W/O S.K.CHANDRA SHEKAR HOUSE HOLD DUTIES R/O SRI BALAJI TRADES, AMARAPURAM, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER AND
1. HINDUSTAN PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD A GOVT OF INDIA, ENTERPRISES) HAVING ITS REGISTRATION OFFICE AT 17, JAMSHEDJI TATA ROAD, MUMBAI, REP.BY ITS CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR.
2. HINDUSTAN PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD A GOVT OF INDIA, ENTERPRISES) VIJAYAWADA LPG REGIONAL OFFICE, IDA, KONDAPALLI KRISHNA DISTRICT, REP.BY ITS COORDINATOR.
3. HINDUSTAN PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD A GOVT OF INDIA, ENTERPRISES) ANANTAPUR REGIONAL OFFICE,R.R.MANSION,1- 4-609, 2ND FLOOR, HLC COLONY, ANANTAPUR- 515 001, REP.BY ITS COORDINATOR.
4. HINDUSTAN PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD A GOVT OF INDIA, ENTERPRISES) ANANTAPUR REGIONAL OFFICE,R.R.MANSION,1- 4-609, 2ND FLOOR, HLC COLONY, ANANTAPUR- 515 001, REP.BY ITS SENIOR REGIONAL MANAGER.
...RESPONDENT(S):
JS,J W.P.No.15781/2011
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 4th Respondent in issuing the impugned Proceedings No.SSP/LPG, dated 14.05.2011 in disqualifying the petitioner for allotment of LPG Dealership at Amarapuram, Anantapur District, as illegal, arbitrary and consequently direct the Respondents to allot the LPG Dealership of Amarapuram Village and Mandal, Ananatpur District in favour of the Petitioner IA NO: 1 OF 2011(WPMP 18899 OF 2011 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the impugned Proceedings No.SSP/LPG, Dated 14.05.2011 of the 4th Respondent, pending disposal of the writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. RAVI SHANKAR JANDHYALA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. SREEKANTH REDDY AMBATI
JS,J W.P.No.15781/2011
The Court made the following ORDER:
No representation for the petitioner.
2. Though the matter was listed today under the caption “for dismissal”, there was no representation for the petitioner.
3. On the other hand, learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 4 submits that the petitioner has filed W.P.No.25878 of 2011 questioning the conditional letter issued to the 4th respondent – Sri G.B. Shiva Kumar and further submits that the 4th respondent is operating the petrol bunk since the year 2011.
4. In view of the submission made by the learned Standing Counsel, the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication.
5. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date: 10.09.2025 KAS