Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/2642/2019 of SUBBA RAO THUMMALA Vs THE PASS PORT OFFICER on 9 September 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] WEDNESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 2642/2019 Between: 1. SUBBA RAO THUMMALA, S/O. SATYANARAYANA THUMMALA, AGE

APHC010058212019

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

[3459]

WEDNESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM

WRIT PETITION NO: 2642/2019

Between:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. SUBBA RAO THUMMALA, S/O. SATYANARAYANA THUMMALA, AGE 43YEARS, 6TH LANE, J K C COLLEGE ROAD, GUNTUR, ANDHRA PRADESH.

...PETITIONER AND

1. THE PASS PORT OFFICER, REGIONAL PASSPORT OFFICE, MINISTRY OF EXTERNAL AFFAIRS, VIJAYAWADA

2. THE PASSPORT OFFICER, REGIONAL PASSPORT OFFICE, MINISTRY OF EXTERNAL AFFAIRS, NEAR P.F OFFICE, BESIDE RYTHU BAZAR, MARRIPALEM VUDA LAYOUT, N A D POST, VISAKHAPATNAM.

...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not renewing/reissuing the passport of the petitioner as illegal, arbitrary, violative of principles of natural justice and violative of Articles 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents authorities to renew/reissue the passport for the passport No. G4991161 of the petitioner and pass

IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to consider the application of the petitioner to renew/reissue the passport No.G4991161 of the petitioner pending disposal of the Writ Petition, pending disposal of the writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. BRAHMA REDDYVATTIJANNALA Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA The Court made the following ORDER:

No representation for the petitioner.

On the earlier occasions also i.e., on 20.08.2025 and 28.08.2025, there was no representation for the petitioner. Hence, the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption “for dismissal”.

Even today there is no representation for the petitioner. It appears that the petitioner is not interested to prosecute the case.

Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for default. No order as to costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any shall stand closed.

__________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date: 10.09.2025 KAS

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead