Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/9084/2015 of Mantena Venkata Suryanarayana Raju, Vs Union of India on 8 September 2025
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] TUESDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 9084/2015 Between: 1. MANTENA VENKATA SURYANARAYANA RAJU,, S/O. NARAYANA RAJU,
APHC010137572015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 9084/2015
Between:
1. MANTENA
VENKATA
SURYANARAYANA
RAJU,,
S/O.
NARAYANA RAJU, AGED: ABOUT 86 YEARS, OCC: FORMER
UNDERGROUND FREEDOM FIGHTER, ELURUPADU VILLAGE, KALLA MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, A.P.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. UNION OF INDIA, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS, LOK NAYAK BHAWAN, KHAN
MARKET, NEW DELHI - 110 003.
2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL
SECRETARY,
REVENUE
(FF.III)
DEPARTMENT,
A.P.
SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD.
3. THE COLLECTOR DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, WEST GODAVARI
DISTRICT, ELURU.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ of Mandmaus or any other appropriate Writ or direction declaring the action of the respondent in not granting the pension from the date of the Swatantrata Sainik Samman Pension 1980 to the petitioner as illegal arbitrary and contrary to the judgments of the Hon'ble Supreme Court and consequently direct the respondent to grant pension with effect from the date of the scheme or at least from the date of filing application dt. 06-01-1982 and pay the arrears from the date of grant and consequentially direct the Respondent No.1 to grant
the pension under the SSPS, 1980 from the date of the Scheme, till the date of issuance IA NO: 1 OF 2015(WPMP 11976 OF 2015
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 1st respondent to sanction the pension with effect from the date of the Swatantrata Sainik Samman Pension forthwith Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. RAMBABU KOPPINEEDI
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP)
2. DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication and the writ petition has become infructuous.
Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.
As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
9th September, 2025 cbn
THE HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WP No.9084 of 2015
9th September, 2025 cbn