Bombay High Court
ACB/42/2024 of XYZ Vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER on 15 October 2026
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 952 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2342 OF 2024 VAIBHAV RAVINDRA BEHERE VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER … Mr. Joydeep Chatterji, Advocate for Applicant Ms. R. R. Tandale,APP for the Respondent/State APPLICATION FOR CANCELLATION OF
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
952 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2342 OF 2024
VAIBHAV RAVINDRA BEHERE
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
…
Mr. Joydeep Chatterji, Advocate for Applicant Ms. R. R. Tandale,APP for the Respondent/State APPLICATION FOR CANCELLATION OF BAIL NO. 42 OF 2024
XYZ
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
Mr. N. B. Patekar, Advocate for the Applicant Ms. R. R. Tandale,APP for the Respondent/State CORAM : R. M. JOSHI, J.
DATED
: 15th OCTOBER, 2026
PER COURT :-
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Mentioned out of turn.
2. Application for Cancellation of Bail No. 42 of 2024 is not on board. By consent of both sides, the application is taken on record.
3. Learned Advocates for both sides, on instructions, state that the accused have already been acquitted upon conclusion of the trial. As such, nothing survives in these applications.
4. In view of the above, both applications are disposed of as infructuous. ( R. M. JOSHI, J.) ssp 952 APPLN 2342.2024.odt 1 of 1 2026:BHC-AUG:48983