Bombay High Court
ACB/7/2025 of UDDHAV SHEHRAO JAYBHAYE Vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS on 14 October 2026
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD APPLICATION FOR CANCELLATION OF BAIL NO. 7 OF 2025 Uddhav Shehrao Jaybhaye VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra And Others Mr. P. P. More a /w Mr. K. A . Pathade, Advocate for applicant Mr. S. B. Narwade, APP for respondent-State CORAM : R. M.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
APPLICATION FOR CANCELLATION OF BAIL NO. 7 OF 2025
Uddhav Shehrao Jaybhaye
VERSUS
The State Of Maharashtra And Others
Mr. P. P. More a/w Mr. K. A. Pathade, Advocate for applicant Mr. S. B. Narwade, APP for respondent-State CORAM : R. M. JOSHI, J.
DATE
: 14th OCTOBER, 2026
PER COURT :-
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. This application is for cancellation of pre-arrest bail granted by the Sessions Court by order dated 07.12.2024 passed in Criminal Bail Application No. 1102 of 2024 in Crime No. 0491 of 2024 for the offences punishable under Sections 352, 351(3), 324(4), 191(1), 119(1), 115(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
2. This application is filed essentially on the ground that the Sessions Court has committed error in recording prima facie findings with regard to non applicability of provisions of Section 119(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.
3. It is contended by learned Counsel for the applicant that the said observations are incorrect and contrary to the allegations against 929-ACB-7-2025.odt
2026:BHC-AUG:48932
contesting respondents.
4. Learned APP sought appropriate orders on the basis of evidence collected during the course of investigation.
5. Learned Counsel for contesting respondents opposed application.
6. Perusal of the charge sheet indicates that offence under Section 119(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita was dropped for want of evidence to support the said change. In view of this fact that there is no justification in causing interference in the order of the Sessions Court. In any case the order impugned is reasoned order and appropriate in the facts of the case. Hence, application stands dismissed. (R. M. JOSHI, J.) B. S. Joshi 929-ACB-7-2025.odt